Affiliation:
1. ESKİŞEHİR TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Abstract
Today, to reduce fossil fuel consumption and to prevent gas emissions that are increasing day by day, vehicles working with electrical energy have started to be produced and developed. The environmental impact of the batteries of electric vehicles, which are increasing in number, is an undeniable fact and is predicted to be a major problem. In this study, three different alternative recycling processes were selected for waste lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), namely pyrometallurgical process, hydrometallurgical process and direct recycling.These processes were compared in terms of their technical, economic, environmental and social aspects using a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach.. From this point of view, in this study, entropy method which is an objective method was used to weight the criteria and Analytic Network Process (ANP) and TOPSIS methods were used to prioritise the alternatives in order to determine the best process for the recycling of waste LIBs. The alternatives were determined as being pyrometallurgical process, hydrometallurgical process and direct recycling, and these alternatives were evaluated in terms of environmental, economic, technical, and social dimensions. Afterwards, sensitivity analysis was performed. The ranking results showed that direct recycling is the best alternative (with values of 0.68 and 0.8101 for ANP and TOPSIS, respectively). In addition, sensitivity analysis was applied for the robustness of the results. As a result of the sensitivity analysis, direct recycling was found to be the best alternative.
Publisher
Environmental Research and Technology
Subject
Pollution,Waste Management and Disposal,Water Science and Technology,Environmental Engineering
Reference60 articles.
1. S. Kocabey, “Elektrikli otomobillerin dünü, bugünü ve geleceği,” Akıllı Ulaşım Sistemleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi, Vol. 1(1), Article 1623, 2018. [Turkish].
2. E. Can Güven, and K. Gedik, “Environmental management of end-of-life electric vehicle batteries,” Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, Vol. 9(2), pp. 726737, 2019. [CrossRef]
3. B. Çelebi, “Plug-in hibrit elektrikli araçlar, mühendislik ve fen bilimlerinde yeni gelişmeler (pp. 167194). SRA Publishing, 2020. [Turkish]
4. United Notions Climate Change. Sharm El-Sheikh Climate Change Conference - November 2022. https://unfccc.int/cop27 2022.
5. İ. O. Gündüz, and S. Yakar, “Evaluation of tax incentives aimed at electric automobiles in the European Union and Turkey. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Vol. 29(4), pp. 204-222, 2020. [Turkish] [CrossRef]
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献