Comparison of waste lithium-ion batteries recycling methods by different decision making techniques

Author:

ÖZTÜRK Mahmut1ORCID,EVİN Esra1ORCID,ÖZKAN Aysun1ORCID,BANAR Mufide1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. ESKİŞEHİR TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ

Abstract

Today, to reduce fossil fuel consumption and to prevent gas emissions that are increasing day by day, vehicles working with electrical energy have started to be produced and developed. The environmental impact of the batteries of electric vehicles, which are increasing in number, is an undeniable fact and is predicted to be a major problem. In this study, three different alternative recycling processes were selected for waste lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), namely pyrometallurgical process, hydrometallurgical process and direct recycling.These processes were compared in terms of their technical, economic, environmental and social aspects using a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach.. From this point of view, in this study, entropy method which is an objective method was used to weight the criteria and Analytic Network Process (ANP) and TOPSIS methods were used to prioritise the alternatives in order to determine the best process for the recycling of waste LIBs. The alternatives were determined as being pyrometallurgical process, hydrometallurgical process and direct recycling, and these alternatives were evaluated in terms of environmental, economic, technical, and social dimensions. Afterwards, sensitivity analysis was performed. The ranking results showed that direct recycling is the best alternative (with values of 0.68 and 0.8101 for ANP and TOPSIS, respectively). In addition, sensitivity analysis was applied for the robustness of the results. As a result of the sensitivity analysis, direct recycling was found to be the best alternative.

Publisher

Environmental Research and Technology

Subject

Pollution,Waste Management and Disposal,Water Science and Technology,Environmental Engineering

Reference60 articles.

1. S. Kocabey, “Elektrikli otomobillerin dünü, bugünü ve geleceği,” Akıllı Ulaşım Sistemleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi, Vol. 1(1), Article 1623, 2018. [Turkish].

2. E. Can Güven, and K. Gedik, “Environmental management of end-of-life electric vehicle batteries,” Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, Vol. 9(2), pp. 726737, 2019. [CrossRef]

3. B. Çelebi, “Plug-in hibrit elektrikli araçlar, mühendislik ve fen bilimlerinde yeni gelişmeler (pp. 167194). SRA Publishing, 2020. [Turkish]

4. United Notions Climate Change. Sharm El-Sheikh Climate Change Conference - November 2022. https://unfccc.int/cop27 2022.

5. İ. O. Gündüz, and S. Yakar, “Evaluation of tax incentives aimed at electric automobiles in the European Union and Turkey. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Vol. 29(4), pp. 204-222, 2020. [Turkish] [CrossRef]

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3