Evaluating compost for hydrogen and methane rich gas production via supercritical water gasification-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Evaluating compost for hydrogen and methane rich gas production via supercritical water gasification

Published:2023-09-30 Issue:3 Volume:6 Page:189-195
ISSN:2636-8498
Container-title:Environmental Research and Technology
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

YILDIRIR Eyüp¹^ORCID,ÜREMEK Nihal²^ORCID,BALLİCE Levent²^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. USAK UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING

2. EGE UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES, CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PR.

Abstract

The compost produced from organic wastes (MSW, city market’s wastes and wood dust) was selected to be processed via supercritical water gasification (SCWG) in order to produce gas product consisting of hydrogen and methane mainly. The effects of parameters such as temperature, reaction time and KOH as an additive were determined and around 55 vol.% of H2 and CH4 in the gas product was found after 30 min reaction time together with KOH, at 500 oC. The red mud catalysts did not improve the gasification yields even though they increased the calorific value of the product gas.

Publisher

Environmental Research and Technology

Subject

Pollution,Waste Management and Disposal,Water Science and Technology,Environmental Engineering

Reference17 articles.

1. S. Kaza, L. Yao, P. Bhada-Tata, and F. Van Woerden, “What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050,” The World Bank, 2018. [CrossRef]

2. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, “Tarımsal Gübre İstatistikleri,” 2019. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1001 Accessed on May 27, 2020.

3. J. Domínguez, C. A. Edwards, and S. Subler, “A comparison of vermicomposting and composting methods to process animal wastes,” Biocycle, 57–59, 1997.

4. F. Zuccconi, and M. Bertoldi, “Compost specifications for the production and characterization of compost from municipal solid wastes,” In: M. de Bertoldi, M. P. Ferranti, P. L'Hermite, and F. Zucconi, (Eds.), Compost: Production, Quality and Use. Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, pp. 3051, 1987.

5. C. Tognetti, F. Laos, M. J. Mazzarino, and M.T. Hernández, “Composting vs. vermicomposting: A comparison of end product quality,” Compost Science & Utilization, Vol. 13, pp. 6–13, 2005. [CrossRef]