Prinzip und Urteilskraft in der Medizinethik

Author:

Salloch Sabine1,Schildmann Jan2,Vollmann Jochen2

Affiliation:

1. Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Institut für Medizinische Ethik u.Geschichte d. Me, Bochum, Deutschland

2. Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Institut für Medizinische Ethik u. Geschichte d. M, Bochum, Deutschland

Abstract

Zusammenfassung Diverging positions can be identified in applied ethics with regard to the justification, nature and application of ethical principles. In this article we will discuss the preconditions for establishing a relation between general principles and the particular situation which is to be evaluated in ethical judgment. The functioning of principles in applied ethics will be discussed on the exemplary basis of medical ethics. In a first step, current meta-ethical discussions on moral particularism will be analysed to see what aspects they may contribute to the side of the principle or the general in ethical judgment. In a next step, the side of the particular or situational will be illuminated against the background of current discussions in the context of the “empirical turn” in medical ethics. Based on these considerations, the importance of the power of judgment in medical ethics will be stressed and a model of productive and reflective judgment will be sketched.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Philosophy

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Paternalismus;Handbuch Bildungs- und Erziehungsphilosophie;2019-08-01

2. Autonomy, Perfectionism and the Justification of Education;Studies in Philosophy and Education;2014-04-27

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3