Vicarious Liability Theory on Vicarious Liability on Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the context of Cryptocurrency

Author:

Ayu Pramachanti Rumiartha ,Timotius Nico Yogatama

Abstract

This study aims to discuss and analyze how substitute accountability in Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the context of Cryptocurrency, analyzed with Vicarious Liability theory. The use of Artificial Intelligence is also often used in the business of digital money transactions, for example such as cryptocurrency. Technological developments have given birth to various kinds of alternative tools or instruments as a substitute for money, which could be possible for violations of the law in the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in cryptocurrency transactions. The research method used in this study is a type of normative legal research method. In normative legal research, a study that leads to the process of finding legal rules, legal principles, and legal doctrines that function to answer legal issues faced. The choice of the type of normative legal research in this study is related to the analysis of Vicarious Liability Theory in the context of substitute liability in Artificial Intelligence (AI). The results of the study show the importance of understanding the theory of Vicarious Liability as a theory that determines substitute liability in Artificial Intelligence (AI), this is because the use of Artificial Intelligence is also often used in the business of digital money transactions, for example such as cryptocurrency, so it does not rule out the possibility that the AI does not carry out actions in accordance with AI commands which will certainly harm all parties, including business consumers of digital financial transactions in the event of a digital transaction error, then the person responsible is not the AI subject but the subject who from the beginning provides the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in cryptocurrency transactions.

Publisher

Universitas Bali Dwipa

Reference16 articles.

1. Eli Dourado and Jerry Brito, (2014), Bitcoin - Solving Double Spending, The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, London, hlm. 4.

2. Ferry Mulyanto, (2015), Utilization of Cryptocurrency as the Application of Rupiah Currency into Digital Form Using Bitcoin Technology, IJNS – Indonesian Journal on Networking and Security – Volume. 4 No. 4, p. 7.

3. Haruli Dwicaksana Pujiyono. (2020). "Legal Effects Arising from Cryptocurrency as a Payment Instrument in Indonesia", Journal of Private Law Civil Affairs Section, Faculty of Law, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/privatlaw/article/view/48407/29941, accessed March 5, 2024.

4. Lili Rasjidi & Ira Thania Rasjidi, (2002). Introduction to Legal Philosophy, Mandar Maju, Bandung, p. 74.

5. Mukti fajar and Achmad Yulianto, (2015). Dualism of Normative & Empirical Legal Research, Student Library, Yogyakarta, p. 280

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3