Effectiveness of stereotaxic radiosurgery for supratentorial cavernous malformations

Author:

Kravets L. Ya.1,Gryaznov S. N.2ORCID,Kalinina S. Ya.1,Ivanov P. I.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Privolzhskiy Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia

2. Ivanovo Regional Clinical Hospital

3. A.L. Polenov Russian Research Institute of Neurosurgery – branch of V.A. Almazov National Medical Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russia

Abstract

The study objective is an objective assessment of the treatment outcome with a gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) in different types of supratentorial cavernous malformations on the basis of their sizes and clinical symptoms dynamic changes after the treatment.Materials and methods. GKRS outcomes in 145 patients with hemisphere cavernous malformations (58 male, 87 female, the mean age 43,3 ± 11,9) were analyzed by comparing the initial and control data in all the patients and the telephone interview of 91 (37 male, 54 female, the mean age being 42,2 ± 11,9) patients.Results. On the basis of the “CM size reduction” criterion the efficacy of GKRS in the first magnetic resonance imaging control was 70 %. It was comparable in type I and type II CMs (76,3 and 72,5 % accordingly), but it was evidently worse in type III CMs (p = 0,0032). Repeated hemorrhages were noted in 3 observations in deep type I CM. Totally, statistically evident dependence on CM size reduction (p = 0,0413) was obtained on the clinical efficacy criterion with initially developed symptoms, which in turn means does not prove its effectiveness in type III CMs. In epileptic syndromes accompanying CMs, the efficacy of GKRS was selective, and did not correlate with CM size reduction, but mostly depended on the genesis and course of epileptic seizures.Conclusion. GKRS appears to be a justified method of treatment for clinically compensated mobile patients with type I and type II CMs. The clinical effectiveness of GKRS in such patients is in no way inferior to open surgery and does not exceed the number of its complications. CM type III should be excluded from the objects of treatment by GKRS.Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.Informed consent. All patients gave written informed consent to participate in the study and for the publication of their data.

Publisher

Publishing House ABV Press

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3