Analysis of the structure of revision interventions in elderly and senile patients with degenerative pathology of the lumbar spine

Author:

Klimov V. S.1ORCID,Evsyukov A. V.2ORCID,Khalepa R. V.2,Ryabykh S. O.3ORCID,Amelina E. V.4ORCID,Markin S. P.5,Vasilenko I. I.6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Federal Center of Neurosurgery, Ministry of Health of Russia; Novosibirsk State Medical University

2. Federal Center of Neurosurgery, Ministry of Health of Russia

3. National Ilizarov Medical Research Centre for Traumatology and Ortopaedics, Ministry of Health of Russia

4. Novosibirsk State Medical University

5. Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics n. a. Ya. L. Tsivyan, Ministry of Health of Russia

6. Federal Center of Neurosurgery, Ministry of Health of Russia; Research Institute of Clinical and Experimental Lymрhology – Branch of Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The study objective is to study the causes of repeated surgical treatment in patients of an older age group with degenerative pathology of the lumbar spine.Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of the treatment of 962 patients who underwent surgical treatment of degenerative pathology on the basis of the FCN of Novosibirsk from 2013 to 2017. A total of 360 men, 602 women; average age 66 years. 624 (64.9 %) patients underwent decompression, 338 patients (35.1 %) underwent stabilizing intervention in combination with decompression. The study group consisted of 98 (10.2 %) patients who underwent repeated operations taking into account the inclusion and exclusion criteria. On average, the period after the previous intervention is 17 months (from 1 day to 6 year). 68 patients (69.4 %) previously underwent decompression interventions, 30 (30.6 %) rigid stabilization. The indication for revision treatment was the presence of pain and (or) neurological deficiency, resistant to treatment for at least 6 weeks. Evaluation criteria are described, and the structure of complications is analyzed. The minimum follow-up period after repeated surgery was 1 year, the maximum 6 years.Results. Iatrogenic factors were detected in 39 patients (39.8 %). Progression of degenerative pathology in 59 (60.2 %) patients. More often, repeated intervention was performed at the level of L4–L5 (36.1 %), the cranial adjacent segment was 76.5 %, and the caudal segment was 23.5 %. The minimum period of manifestation of continued degeneration is 3 months. The development of the disease of the adjacent segment after fixation is higher in the period of 3–4 years (p = 0.015). Patients with repeated surgical treatment after decompression for continued degeneration had a higher BMI of 32.3 (p = 0.12), as well as patients with damage to the adjacent segment 32.5 (p = 0.10), compared with the group of primary patients (BMI 30.6 on average). The similar dependance is registered for patients after stabilization: BMI of patients with repeated interventions is 34.5 that is higher than BMI of primary interventions group (on average 33.2, р = 0.13).Conclusions. The main reason for repeated interventions in patients of an older age group is the progression of degenerative pathology on the segments on the segment operated as as well as the adjacent segments (60.2 % repeated interventions, 46.9 % at the adjacent level including).Repeated surgical treatment of patients of an older age group in the early period (for up to 1 year) is most often due to insufficiently effective primary surgical intervention with prevailing early recurrence of disk herniation (1.6 % patients of total number of primarily operated). In the long term (more than 3 years), the reason for repeated surgical treatment is due to the development of an adjacent segment disease where the number of operations of patients with primarily made rigid fixation is increasing progressively in the course of time.High BMI is a predictor of the development of instability of the vertebral motor segment and continued degeneration of the operated one as well as the adjacent level in the long follow-up time.

Publisher

Publishing House ABV Press

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3