Affiliation:
1. St. Luka's Clinical Hospital
2. St. Luka's Clinical Hospital; Department of Urology, S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy, Ministry of Defense of Russia
3. St. Luka's Clinical Hospital; Department of Urology, I.I. Mechnikov North-West State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Abstract
Objective: to study the safety of omitting the antibiotic prophylaxis before transperineal prostate biopsy.Materials and methods. The prospective randomized study included data, obtained during the diagnostical process of 85 patients, who underwent transperineal prostate biopsy in 2020. In the control group (n = 50) patients received 1 g Ceftriaxone IV 1 h before the biopsy. In the study group (n = 35) biopsy was performed without previous antibacterial prophylaxis. Age median was 63.2 (52-75) years.Results. No significant differences in the infection complications rate (UTI, soft tissues infections, prostatitis, fever, sepsis) were obtained between the groups. No patient developed UTI, prostatitis or sepsis, confirmed with urine culture.Conclusion. Performing transperineal prostate biopsy without antibiotic prophylaxis seems to be a safe alternative to common prophylaxis regiments, dedicated to infection complications prevention after prostate biopsy.
Publisher
Publishing House ABV Press
Subject
Urology,Nephrology,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology,Surgery
Reference23 articles.
1. Mottet N., Bellmunt J., Briers E. et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer, 2020. Pp. 31-45. Available at: https://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/Mottet-N-et-al.-Eur-Urol-2021-792243.-EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG-Guidelines-on-Prostate-Cancer-2020-Update.-Part-1.pdf.
2. Borghesi M., Ahmed H., Nam R. et al. Complications after systematic, random, and image-guided prostate biopsy. Eur Urol 2017;71(3):353-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.004.
3. Wenzel M., Theissen L., Preisser F. et al. Complication rates after TRUS guided transrectal systematic and MRI-targeted prostate biopsies in a high-risk region for antibiotic resistances. Front Surg 2020;7:7. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.00007.
4. Keln A.A., Zyryanov A.V., Izmailov A.A. et al. Comparative analysis of adverse events using different methods of prostate biopsy. Onkourologiya = Cancer Urology 2019;15(1):66-74. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17650/1726-9776-2019-15-1-66-74
5. Loeb S., van den Heuvel S., Zhu X. et al. Infectious complications and hospital admissions after prostate biopsy in a european randomized trial. 2012;61(6):1110-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.058.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献