Evaluation of quality of life of patients after surgical treatment of kidney cancer

Abstract

Background. Restoring the quality of life of patients to a level comparable to that of practically healthy people is the most important task of medicine in general. At this stage of development of science, the main goal in the treatment of malignant diseases remains the preservation of life. However, now in oncological practice, methods whose potential allows not only to preserve life as such, but also to ensure the high quality of this life in all its manifestations, are acquiring greater and greater significance.The objective of the study is to compare the quality of life of persons with localized kidney cancer in the early and late periods after surgical treatment by radical nephroectomy and laparoscopic resection of renal tissue.Materials and methods. A questionnaire survey using SF-36 (Short Form-36), designed for a comprehensive assessment of the quality of life associated with health.Results. The quality of life of patients with localized kidney cancer before treatment is reduced due to a number of physical and mental nature, limiting labor, domestic and social activity and causing a feeling of dissatisfaction with their lives in general. These problems are disorders of physical, social and emotional functioning, physical pain, deterioration of general and mental health, limitations of role functioning due to physical and emotional state. After surgical treatment with laparoscopic resection, complete satisfaction of patients with the quality of their life was achieved during the first 1–3 postoperative months; after radical nephroectomy – not earlier than 1–3 years.Conclusion. One of the advantages of laparoscopic resection over radical nephroectomy is a higher quality of life of patients in the early and late periods after the intervention.