Retroperitoneoscopic access in organ-preserving treatment of renal cell carcinoma

Author:

Chaykov V. S.1ORCID,Dementyev I. O.1ORCID,Karyakin O. B.1ORCID,Shchukina E. O.1ORCID,Troyanov A. V.1ORCID,Ivanov S. A.2ORCID,Kaprin A. D.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center — branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia

2. A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center — branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia; Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

3. Peoples' Friendship University of Russia; P.A. Hertzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia; National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia

Abstract

Background. Renal cell carcinoma is one of the most common urologic cancers. Due to development of modern diagnostic methods, kidney tumors are often diagnosed at early stages (cT1a-T1b). The golden standard of treatment of localized renal cell carcinoma is tumor resection. In retroperitoneoscopic access, the time to artery access is decreased, the risk of intra- and postoperative complications is reduced. Retroperitoneal access is preferable for tumors located on the lateral or posterior kidney surface.Aim. To analyze the results of treatment of patients after retroperitoneoscopic kidney resection.Materials and methods. Between 2018 and 2021, at the A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center - branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center 47 retroperitoneoscopic kidney resections were performed (29 (61.7 %) in men, 18 (38.3 %) in women) due to stage cT1aN0M0 renal cell carcinoma. Retrospective analysis of demographic data, comorbid status, tumor characteristics, operative time, blood loss volume, frequency and severity of complications per the Clavien-Dindo classification was performed. Complexity of resection was evaluated using the R.E.N.A.L. scale.Results. Mean patient age was 63 (38-79) years, body mass index was 29.9 (22-39) kg/m2. Tumor of the left kidney was diagnosed in 24 (51.0 %) cases, of the right kidney - in 22 (46.8 %) cases, bilateral lesions - in 1 (2.2 %) case. Mean tumor size was 22.4 (11-39) mm. Resection had low complexity in 35 (74.5 %) cases, intermediate complexity in 12 (25.5 %) cases. Mean operative time was 156 (80-280) minutes, mean warm ischemia time was 19 (7-32) minutes, number of resections with zero ischemia was 15 (31.9 %), mean blood loss volume was 53 (10-300) mL, number of resections without renal parenchyma suturing was 10 (21.3 %). Mean hospitalization time after surgery was 5 days. Postoperative complications were observed in 4 (8.5 %) cases: bleeding (severity grade II per the Clavien-Dindo classification) in 1 (2.1 %) case, postoperative infectious complications (severity grade II) - in 2 (4.2 %) cases, subcutaneous hematoma (severity grade I) - in 1 (2.1 %) case.Conclusion. Retroperitoneoscopic access is effective and safe. This is confirmed by low frequency and severity of postoperative complications. This access allows to reduce hospitalization time and pain management medication which accelerates patient mobilization and recovery. Comparative analysis shows that retroperitoneoscopic kidney resection has the same effectiveness as laparoscopic resection.

Publisher

Publishing House ABV Press

Subject

Urology,Nephrology,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology,Surgery

Reference27 articles.

1. State of oncological care in Russia in 2019. Eds.: A.D. Kaprin, VV Starinskiy, A.O. Shachzadova. Moscow: MNIOI im. PA Gertsena - filial FGBU “NMITS radiologii” Minzdrava Rossii, 2020. 239 p. (In Russ.).

2. Bazaev V.V., Dutov V.V., Eyan P.A., Kazantseva I.A. Incidental renal cell carcinoma: clinical and morphological features. Urologiia = Urology 2013;(2):66-9. (In Russ.).

3. MacLennan S., Imamura M., Lapitan M.C. et al. Systematic review of perioperative and quality-of-life outcomes following surgical management of localised renal cancer. Eur Urol 2012;62(6):1097-117. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.028

4. Van Poppel H., Da Pozzo L., Albrecht W. et al. A prospective randomized EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the complications of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2007;51(6):1606-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.11.013

5. Kadyrov Z.A. Laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic surgeries in urology. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2017. 488 p. (In Russ.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3