Composition analysis of e-liquids and their effects on healthy liver and pharyngeal carcinoma cell lines
-
Published:2022-11-10
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:2147-0294
-
Container-title:Trakya University Journal of Natural Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Trakya Univ J Nat Sci
Author:
GEYİK Caner1ORCID, GUMUS Z. Pinar2ORCID, YARARBAS Gorkem3ORCID
Affiliation:
1. İSTİNYE ÜNİVERSİTESİ 2. Ege Üniversitesi Madde Bağımlılığı, Toksikoloji ve İlaç Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ege Ü. Merkezi Araştırma Test ve Analiz Laboratuvarı Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi 3. EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MADDE BAĞIMLILIĞI, TOKSİKOLOJİ VE İLAÇ BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ
Abstract
Electronic cigarettes have become popular worldwide in recent years despite the effects on health yet to be known. The lack of regulations brings a problem of inconsistency between ingredients and the product label. We aimed to analyse the contents of widely used e-liquids and their effects on two different cell lines. Eleven e-liquid samples were selected according to their availability and popularity. Nicotine, propylene glycol, glycerine, and volatile compounds in e-liquids were analysed by HPLC and GC. MTT cell viability assay was used to determine the effects of e-liquids on Transformed human normal liver epithelial cell line (THLE-2) and human pharyngeal carcinoma cell line (Detroit 562). Nicotine amounts were found to be consistent with product labels. PG and GLY were not only different between brands but also for products within the same brand. THLE-2 cell viability was inversely correlated with e-liquid concentration. However, decreases in cell viability were not correlated with nicotine amount. Interestingly, effects of several samples on Detroit 562 cells were triphasic; decrease in viability at lower doses, cell survival in mid-concentrations and loss of viability in highest doses. The analytical composition of e-liquids differs greatly among products which corresponds to different cellular effects. Viability of cancer cells does not change in a dose-dependent manner might suggest the cellular differences play role in the outcome of these products.
Publisher
Trakya University Journal of Natural Sciences
Subject
General Engineering
Reference36 articles.
1. Bahl, V., Lin, S., Xu, N., Davis, B., Wang, Y.H. & Talbot, P. 2012. Comparison of electronic cigarette refill fluid cytotoxicity using embryonic and adult models. Reproductive Toxicology 34(4): 529–537. 2. Behar, R.Z., Bahl, V., Wang, Y., Lin, S., Xu, N., Davis, B. & Talbot, P. 2012. A method for rapid dose-response screening of environmental chemicals using human embryonic stem cells. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods 66(3): 238–245. 3. Belushkin, M., Djoko, D.T., Esposito, M., Korneliou, A., Jeannet, C., Lazzerini, M. & Jaccard, G. 2019. Selected Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents Levels in Commercial e-Cigarettes. Chemical Research in Toxicology 33(2): 657–668. 4. Berry, K.M., Reynolds, L.M., Collins, J.M., Siegel, M.B., Fetterman, J.L., Hamburg, N.M., Bhatnagar, A., Benjamin, E.J. & Stokes, A. 2019. E-cigarette initiation and associated changes in smoking cessation and reduction: The Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study, 2013-2015. Tobacco Control 28(1): 42–49. 5. Cheng, T. 2014. Chemical evaluation of electronic cigarettes. Tobacco Control 23(Supplement 2): ii11—-ii17.
|
|