Calibration Algorithms for Estimating the Number of Radiogenic Deaths in a Cohort

Author:

Vasilyev E1,Annenkova E1,Biryukov A.2,Orlov Yu.3,Dumansky S1,Tukov A.2

Affiliation:

1. A.I. Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow, Russia

2. A.I. Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center (FMBC) FMBA

3. A.I. Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of FMBA

Abstract

Background: Development of algorithms for estimating the number of radiogenic deaths in a cohort that happened or may happen before an arbitrary moment in time. Algorithms should be based on continuous lifelong risk models and minimize the errors of estimates based on deformable non-radiation models ("seed" models) reflecting the general patterns of Russian mortality, but with the possibility of calibrating according to selected data. Materials and methods: For the study, the databases of the register of liquidators of the consequences of the Chernobyl accident – employees of the enterprises of the Ministry of Atomic Energy of Russia were used. Persons with a non-zero dose of ionizing radiation received as a result of the accident and who were registered in the register until 2018 were selected from the register. There are 7324 men and 655 women in this sample. The number of deaths from the beginning of the observation period until 1996, 2006, 2016 from all causes, as well as from solid cancers and leukemias, was used as a reference data for the calibration. Radiation risk was calculated using UNSCEAR 2006 models. Calibration was performed using the Levenberg – Marquardt method. Results: A general formula was obtained for assessing the excess lifetime risk of death, which is the basis of the developed algorithms. The "seed" models of the risk of death from all causes and from solid cancers and leukemia’s were obtained. In accordance with the purpose of the work, two algorithms have been developed. The first algorithm is intended for direct (without using radiation risk models) estimation of the number of radiation-induced deaths in a cohort. The second uses radiation risk models. The performance of the algorithms was tested using the industry register of liquidators of the consequences of the Chernobyl accident. In particular, a 30 % calculated increase in the estimated number of deaths from radiation-induced solid cancers was recorded using calibrated models. Conclusions: The proposed calculation algorithms for calibrated models provide reliable (if the radiation risk models are considered sufficiently adequate) estimates of the number of Chernobyl deaths for points in time preceding the current one and, presumably, more accurate predictive estimates compared to the calculation algorithm for uncalibrated models. The low sensitivity of the lifelong risk model to variations in the parameters of the background models and the total mortality model makes it possible to apply models calibrated according to the liquidator register to other closely related populations (NPP workers, etc.).

Publisher

Infra-M Academic Publishing House

Subject

Nuclear Energy and Engineering

Reference20 articles.

1. Нормы безопасности МАГАТЭ. Общие требования безопасности, часть 3. [IAEA Safety Standards. General safety requirements, part 3. (In Russ.)]., Normy bezopasnosti MAGATE. Obschie trebovaniya bezopasnosti, chast' 3. [IAEA Safety Standards. General safety requirements, part 3. (In Russ.)].

2. Dawid AP. On Individual Risk.. Synthese. 2017;194:3445-74. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-015-0953-4., Dawid AP. On Individual Risk.. Synthese. 2017;194:3445-74. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-015-0953-4.

3. Report of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation to the General Assembly. Annex B. Uncertainties in risk estimates for radiation-induced cancer. 2012:219., Report of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation to the General Assembly. Annex B. Uncertainties in risk estimates for radiation-induced cancer. 2012:219.

4. Губин АТ, Сакович ВА. Анализ обобщённых моделей радиогенного риска. Часть 1. Модели МКРЗ. Радиация и риск. 2016; 25(4): 48-62. [Gubin AT, Sakovich VA. Analysis of generalized models of radiogenic risk. Part 1. ICRP Models. Radiation and Risk. 2016;25(4):48-62 (in Russ.)]. DOI: 10.21870/0131-3878-2016-25-4-48-62., Gubin AT, Sakovich VA. Analiz obobschennyh modeley radiogennogo riska. Chast' 1. Modeli MKRZ. Radiaciya i risk. 2016; 25(4): 48-62. [Gubin AT, Sakovich VA. Analysis of generalized models of radiogenic risk. Part 1. ICRP Models. Radiation and Risk. 2016;25(4):48-62 (in Russ.)]. DOI: 10.21870/0131-3878-2016-25-4-48-62.

5. Губин АТ, Сакович ВА. Анализ обобщённых моделей радиогенного риска. Часть 2. Модели НКДАР ООН. Радиация и риск. 2016; 25(4): 63-79. [Gubin AT, Sakovich VA. Analysis of generalized models of radiogenic risk. Part 2. ICRP Models. Radiation and Risk. 2016;25(4):63-79 (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.21870/0131 -3878-2016-25-4-63-79., Gubin AT, Sakovich VA. Analiz obobschennyh modeley radiogennogo riska. Chast' 2. Modeli NKDAR OON. Radiaciya i risk. 2016; 25(4): 63-79. [Gubin AT, Sakovich VA. Analysis of generalized models of radiogenic risk. Part 2. ICRP Models. Radiation and Risk. 2016;25(4):63-79 (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.21870/0131 -3878-2016-25-4-63-79.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3