Abstract
As global trade markets have expanded, there has been an increasing volume of agricultural commodities and food products imported to, and exported from, the United Kingdom (UK). In response to these market and political changes, standards for imported foods are being implemented to control the trade of goods and services. Alongside the development and implementation of standards for imported foods, there has been a growing public desire to understand where the food we eat comes from, and increasingly, to understand not just the safety of food, but the inter-country variation in the sustainability of food production practices. For example, is a product sourced from one country comparable to another country in terms of animal welfare, environmental sustainability (for example, greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, biodiversity etc.) and nutritional composition. To inform future research needs, the Food Standards Agency required a detailed understanding of the current data and literature landscape regarding imported food standards, with a particular focus on data availability around three themes: animal welfare, environmental sustainability, and nutritional composition. Data on food safety was not considered as part of the review as this has been well documented in previous research by the Food Standards Agency. To achieve the research needs, a review was undertaken to explore and assess measurable metrics, which could be used to measure and monitor the consistency or differences of imported food production standards across the three themes. The assessment of each theme was coupled with parameters relevant to imported food products consumed in the UK. In addition, the research aimed to inform data gaps and requirements. The information outlined in this report provides an independent assessment of how the three themes are currently considered within international imported food standards and trade agreements. The outputs will inform the Food Standard Agency’s 2023 Annual Review of Food Standards across the UK.
Reference89 articles.
1. Animal Protection Index. (2022). World Animal Protection.
2. ASC. (2022). Salmon Standard. Aquaculture Stewardship Council Standards (PDF)Australia & Republic of Korea. (2014). Korea-Australia Free Trade Agreement - Chapter18. Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. (PDF)
3. Australian Government. (2022). Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code - Standard1.2.8 - Nutrition information requirements. Federal Register of Legislation; Attorney General's Department.
4. Baker, P., Friel, S., Gleeson, D., Thow, A., & Labonte, R. (2019). Trade and nutrition policy coherence: A framing analysis and Australian case study. Public Health Nutrition, 22(12),2329-2337. https://doi:10.1017/S1368980019000752
5. Baumgärtner, S. (2005). Measuring the diversity of what? And for what purpose? A conceptual comparison of ecological and economic biodiversity indices. Environmental Economics. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.894782