Websites Optimization Metrics: A Systematic Literature Review
-
Published:2024-04-10
Issue:2
Volume:24
Page:42-53
-
ISSN:2790-2129
-
Container-title:Journal of Prospective Researches
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:J.P.R.
Author:
Al-Dulaimi Abdullah A.,Al-Mashhadany Shayma M.,Al-Zubaidy Mahmod A.,Al-Dulaimi Azzam A.
Abstract
Websites play an important role in government, educational and commercial organizations. In the field of education, using websites of universities has been increased and because of that it has been importance to ensure that the universities have an effective websites. Various metrics have been used to evaluate the performance of websites. All these metrics affect the performance and quality of website . This paper presented a systematic literature review SLR to get an overview about the current studies of distinct criteria for performance evaluating the websites and each criteria is explored briefly to give the basic idea behind it. In general, the paper’s objective is to give an up-to-date introduction and short review of these criteria . A Systematic literature review is implemented according to the guidelines of performing a SLR in software engineering. The study was based on a comprehensive set of papers gathered from the online libraries published within time span 2010 to 2022 . The results from this SLR include information about the criteria for evaluating the performance of the multi-level web according to previous research, which was divided into applicable sub-criteria, and then the latter was divided into measurable indicators. within a specific period that can help researchers in this field through providing an overview of the current researches in this area. Furthermore, it may serve as a first step towards a great explanation of the topic with the help of SLR
Publisher
Al-Hadba University College
Reference11 articles.
1. Anggraini, N., Kurniawan, A., Wardhani, L., and Hakiem, N. (2018). Speech Recognition Application for the Speech Impaired Using the Android-based Google Cloud Speech API, Telecommunication Computing Electronics and Control, 16(6), pp. 2733-2739. 2. Bethge, J., Serth, S., Staubitz, T., Wuttke, T., Nordemann, O., Das, P., and Meinel, C. (2021). “TransPipe”, In: Meinel, C., Staubitz, T., Schweiger, S., Friedl, C., Kiers, J., Ebner, M., Lorenz, A., Ubachs, G., Mongenet, C., Ruipérez-Valiente, J., and Mendez, M. (Eds.) EMOOCs 2021, Potsdam. 3. Bushell, A., Anstey, J., Butchart, N., Kawatani, Y., Osprey, S., Richter, J., and Yukimoto, S. (2022). Evaluation of the Quasi-biennial Oscillation in Global Climate Models for the SPARC QBO-Initiative, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 148(744), pp. 1459-1489. 4. Gupta, A., Somkunwar, R., Kumari, A., Kumari, A., Godhke, K., and Repale, J. (2021). Web-Based Multilingual Real-Time Speech Transcription Transliteration and Translation System, in proceedings of 5th International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Networks (ISCON), Mathura, India. 5. Juluri, P., Plissonneau, L., and Medhi, D. (2011). Pytomo: A Tool for Analyzing Playback Quality of YouTube Videos, in proceedings of 23rd International Teletraffic Congress (ITC), San Francisco, USA.
|
|