Author:
Afifah Sofie Amalia,Cahyana Atikha Sidhi
Abstract
The development of logistics services that are increasing has caused an increase in customers of PT. Astrans Putra Logistik also increased, this resulted in the logistics warehouse capacity experiencing a buildup of goods that almost filled the warehouse capacity which made operational activities disrupted, and many complaints from customers. Resolution to overcome this warehouse problem needs to be done so that the company’s operational efficiency is not disrupted and warehouse stock capacity becomes better. This study aims to find out the best solution of warehouse problems that occur through a decision making support system design using the AHP method assisted by the use of the Expert Choice 11 application. In making this decision, 4 stages are carried out, namely Intelligence, Design, Choice, and Analysis of Assessment Result which in the process have a 4 kinds of criteria and 4 kinds of alternative solutions. From the calculation of the AHP method assisted by the use of the Expert Choice 11 application, the weight of each criterion was obtained, namely Increased Operational Efficiency getting a weight of 0,259, Number of Items that can be Accommodated getting a weight of 0,086, Company Income getting a weight of 0,495, and Company Expense getting a weight of 0,160. From the calculation of alternative settlements, it was also found that The Addition of a New Departure Fleet got a weight of 0,385, The Construction of Branch Goods Warehouse got a weight of 0,279, Upgrading Small Trucks to Large Trucks got a weight of 0,187, and The Application of a Pre-order system for customers got a weight of 0,149.
Publisher
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo
Reference17 articles.
1. A. Julius Olanta, M. Edy Sianto, I. Gunawan, K. Waktu, K. Pengiriman, and dan Jaminan Ganti Rugi, “PERBANDINGAN METODE ANP DAN AHP DALAM PEMILIHAN JASA KURIR LOGISTIK OLEH PENJUAL GADGET ONLINE,” 2019.
2. N. Nuryanto, E. Elyatuzaka, and A. Ridho, “Peningkatan Kualitas Pengiriman Barang Melalui Sistem Door To Door,” Majalah Ilmiah Bahari Jogja, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 12–25, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.33489/mibj.v20i1.287.
3. M. Faris, R. Dzakiy, and A. Momon, “Analisis Sistem Manajemen Pergudangan Pada PT. XYZ,” vol. VIII, no. 1, 2023.
4. C. Makatengkeng et al., “ANALISIS SISTEM MANAJEMEN PERGUDANGAN PADA PT. TIMUR LAUT JAYA MANADO ANALYSIS OF WAREHOUSE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AT PT. NORTHEAST JAYA MANADO,” 5924 Jurnal EMBA, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 5912–5933, 2019.
5. I. Ayulestari, Y. Farlina, R. Yulistria, and D. Susilawati, “PEMILIHAN GURU FAVORIT MENGGUNAKAN METODE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) DI MI MWB PUI AT-TAHDHIRIYYAH,” JURNAL SWABUMI, vol. 7, no. 2, 2019.