Global Impact of Top Management on Branding and Performance-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Global Impact of Top Management on Branding and Performance

Published:2024-01-10 Issue:1 Volume:25 Page:
ISSN:2598-9936
Container-title:Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies
language:
Short-container-title:ijins

Author:

Rochman Saiful,Hermawan Sigit

Abstract

This study explores how top management commitment to ISO 9001:2015 quality management system influences company branding and employee performance, with employee commitment moderating this relationship. Conducted in a cardboard packaging industry in Sidoarjo, East Java, Indonesia, the research involved 105 employees selected through purposive sampling. Data was collected via personal questionnaire surveys and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling Partial Least Square (SEMPLS). Results show that top management commitment significantly impacts company branding and employee performance. However, employee commitment's moderating effect on the relationship between top management commitment and company branding was found insignificant due to incomplete socialization of the quality management system among employees, while it significantly moderated the relationship between top management commitment and employee performance. This study underlines the importance of top management commitment in ISO 9001:2015 implementation for improving company branding and employee performance and suggests the need for comprehensive socialization of quality management systems. Hightligh: Top management drives branding and performance. Employee commitment moderates top management's influence. Incomplete socialization affects employee commitment's moderating effect. Keywords: ISO 9001:2015, Top management commitment, Company branding, Employee performance, Moderation.

Publisher

Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Reference73 articles.

1. C. Budayan and O. Okudan, “Roadmap for the implementation of total quality management (TQM) in ISO 9001-certified construction companies: Evidence from Turkey,” Ain Shams Eng. J., vol. 13, no. 6, p. 101788, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2022.101788.

2. H. Latan, C. J. Chiappetta Jabbour, A. B. Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, P. de Camargo Fiorini, and C. Foropon, “Innovative efforts of ISO 9001-certified manufacturing firms: Evidence of links between determinants of innovation, continuous innovation and firm performance,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 223, p. 107526, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107526.

3. R. Nurcahyo, Zulfadlillah, and M. Habiburrahman, “Relationship between ISO 9001:2015 and operational and business performance of manufacturing industries in a developing country (Indonesia),” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 1, p. e05537, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05537.

4. H. T. Ingason, “Best Project Management Practices in the Implementation of an ISO 9001 Quality Management System,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 194, pp. 192–200, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.133.

5. B. Manders, H. J. de Vries, and K. Blind, “ISO 9001 and product innovation: A literature review and research framework,” Technovation, vol. 48–49, pp. 41–55, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.11.004.