Comparison of 24×20 mm2 swept-source OCTA and fluorescein angiography for the evaluation of lesions in diabetic retinopathy

Author:

Zeng Qiao-Zhu, ,Yao Yu-Ou,Jin En-Zhong,Qu Jin-Feng,Zhao Ming-Wei, , , ,

Abstract

AIM: To compare ultra-widefield (24×20 mm2) swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) and fluorescein angiography (FA) in the evaluation of diabetic retinopathy (DR) lesions. METHODS: Forty-six eyes of 23 patients with treatment-naïve DR were included at Peking University People’s Hospital from September 1, 2021, until December 31, 2021, as well as 23 age and gender matched healthy controls. Quantitative assessments of DR lesions on FA and SS-OCTA (superficial capillary plexus, SCP, 24×20 mm2) were performed. RESULTS: Area of fovea avascular zone (FAZ) was larger in DR cases than controls (0.34±0.069 mm2 vs 0.287±0.108 mm2, P=0.006). In DR eyes, the mean FAZ area was 0.34±0.069 and 0.334±0.087 mm2 on SS-OCTA and FA, respectively (P=0.428), while the median FAZ perimeter was 2.382 (IQR, 2.201-2.59) and 2.333 (IQR, 2.138-2.6) mm on SS-OCTA and FA images (P=0.733). There was no significant difference in the size of the non-perfusion area (NPA) between the images on SS-OCTA and FA (12.389, IQR 4.96-28.3 and 11.125, IQR 5-28.31 mm2, P=0.197). The median total microaneurysm (MA) count was 35 (IQR, 19-46) and 73 (IQR, 43-93) on SS-OCTA and FA (P<0.001), respectively. No significant difference in intra-retinal microvascular abnormality (IRMA) and neovascularization (NV) count was found between the two techniques. The intraclass coefficient (ICCs) of all the parameters above indicated stable repeatability. CONCLUSION: Ultra-widefield SS-OCTA represents a reliable, noninvasive, and quantitative imaging technique in the assessment of microvasculature in DR, which offers a potential substitute for FA in DR evaluation.

Publisher

Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO Press)

Subject

Ophthalmology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3