Affiliation:
1. Southern Federal University
2. Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences
3. Institute of Social and Humanitarian Education, Moscow State Pedagogical University (MPGU)
Abstract
Social Software as a special kind of organization of goal-oriented joint activity is considered in the present article in the context of cultural-historical epistemology, which is based on the understanding of knowledge as a sign-semiotic, historical phenomenon. This approach, according to the authors, makes it possible to reveal in a new way the educational and pedagogical potential of social software, which today attracts the attention, first of all, of sociologists, political scientists, and economists, who only partially touch upon its cognitive parameters. Meanwhile, appeal to the epistemological dimension of social software allows us to emphasize characteristics that significantly expand the scope of its application, and in particular, the characteristics that open up an additional opportunity to quite effectively motivate students for self-education, for an inherently creative understanding of knowledge as a sociocultural value. The “motivational” potential of social software today is acquiring a particularly important role in the educational structures of “research education”. In such structures, step-by-step software opens up for the student, on the one hand, a sequence of operations that lead research to knowledge as the goal of education, and on the other hand, it dramatically changes in the eyes of students the process of assimilation of information determined by the curriculum, since it involves participation in its “creation”. At the same time, the presence of a social dimension in the software gives cultural and historical meaning to the sequence of students’ efforts, which opens up additional opportunities for motivating their activity through an appeal to the cultural and historical status of the scientific activity within which this knowledge was firstly created. The article demonstrates the experience of implementing one of these opportunities to additionally stimulate the attitude towards self-education through the introduction of philosophy faculties students to archival research of university science in Russia.
Publisher
Moscow Polytechnic University
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Education,Philosophy
Reference22 articles.
1. Petrov, M.K. (2004). Yazyk, znak, kul’tura [Language, Sign, Culture], Moscow: URSS, 328 p. ISBN 5-354-00587-6 (In Russ.).
2. Pruzhinin, B.I., Shchedrina, T.G. (2021). A Return to Tradition: The Epistemological Style in Russia’s Post-Soviet Philosophy. In: Bykova, M.F. et al. (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Russian Thought, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 423-443, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-62982-3_20
3. Rezaev, A.V., Tregubova, N.D. (2015). Sociology of Social Intercourse And Sociology of Communication: Distinction and Vistas for the Theoretical Expansion. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsialnye peremeny = Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. No. 1 (125), pp. 14-26, doi: 10.14515/monitoring.2015.1.02 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
4. Toshchenko, Zh. T. (2010). Programmirovanie kak instrument resheniya sotsial’noi problemy [Programming as a Tool for Solving a Social Problem]. Sotsial’naya politika i sotsiologiya [Social politics and sociology]. No. 5 (59), pp. 8–13. Avialable at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_17054227_62956521.pdf (accessed 30.09.2023). (In Russ.).
5. Terziev, V., Stoyanov, E. (2015). Vyzovy upravlencheskogo kontrolya v protsesse sotsial’nogo programmirovaniya [Challenges of Management Control in the Process of Social Software], Novosibirsk: CRNS Publishing House, 318 p. ISBN: 978-5-00068-445-0. Avialable at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_25315645_29900033.pdf (accessed 30.09.2023). (In Russ.).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献