Formation of the Educational Trajectory: Educational Motives and Choices in the Narratives of Students from Moscow Leading Universities

Author:

Noskova A. V.1,Goloukhova D. V.1,Kuzmina E. I.1

Affiliation:

1. Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (MGIMO University)

Abstract

Motives  and  choices  related  to  obtaining  higher  education  represent  a  pressing  issue that occupies its own niche in the research agenda of the sociology of education and related scientific disciplines. The purpose of the article is to reveal the specifics of the formation of different types of educational trajectories from the perspective of the motives of primary and secondary educational choices of students from top-rated universities. The research question was formulated around differences in goal setting and motivational and value bases of choice when constructing different types of university trajectories  – linear and nonlinear.The  collection  of  empirical  information  was  carried  out  through  interviews  with  40  students achieved the higher GPA from Moscow top-rated universities (MSU, MGIMO, HSE, MVTU, etc.).  Informants described their subjective educational experience as a sequence of choices they made in the space of higher education.Analysis  of  students’  narratives  made  it  possible  to  qualitatively  differentiate  between  linear  and  nonlinear  trajectories,  as  well  as  their  subtypes,  differing  in  their  internal  motivation and educational settings. The analysis identified common motivational reasons for choosing a university and majors at the “entrance” to higher education, as well as motives for secondary educational choice specific to different types of university trajectories — motives for keeping and motives for changing a specialty and university. In the informants’ narratives, choosing a university is described as a complex, multimotivated action, in which the motives of prestige, self-development, as well as social and utilitarian motives are highlighted. Educational choices related to keeping or changing the educational trajectory are determined by the desire to avoid risks and having a high level of satisfaction with studies in the case of linear trajectories and the desire  to  gain  new  educational  experience,  obtaining  competencies  that  go  beyond  the  scope of the specialty being studied, as well as environmental factors of the university in the case of non-linear tracks.It is shown that a qualitative research strategy allows the researchers to look at reflected educational choices from the perspective of their semantic content, which is especially in demand due to the growing trend towards individualization of the educational process. It is concluded that empirical knowledge about the motives and methods of shaping the educational trajectories of the current generation of students is necessary for the development of an effective social and educational environment of a modern university, focused on a student-centered approach to learning.

Publisher

Moscow Polytechnic University

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Education,Philosophy

Reference25 articles.

1. Konstantinovskii, D.L., Popova, E.S. (2022). [New Nature of Educational and Professional Trajectories of Young People]. In: Gorshkov, M.K. (Ed). Rossija reformirujushhajasja: ezhegodnik [Reforming Russia: yearbook]. Vol. 20. Moscow: Novyj Hronograf, pp. 379-399, doi: 10.19181/ezheg.2022.14 (In Russ.).

2. Aleshkovskii, I.A., Gasparishvili, A.T., Krukhmaleva, O.V., Narbut, N.P., Savina, N.E. (2023). Peculiarities of the Formation of Educational Trajectories of Russian Students: Assessment and Opportunities. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 137-155, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-4-137-155 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

3. Khavenson, T.E., Chirkina, T.A. (2018). Effectively Maintained Inequality: The Choice of Postsecondary Educational Trajectory in Russia. Ekonomicheskaya Sotsiologiya = Journal of Economic Sociology. Vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 66-89, doi: 10.17323/1726-3247-2018-5-66-89 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

4. Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J.C. (1970). La Reproduction. Elements pour une Theorie du Systeme D’enseignement [The Reproduction: Elements for a Theory of the Educational System] . Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit, 284 p. (Russian Translation: ed. N.A. Shmatko, Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 2007, 267 p.).

5. Romanets, I.I., Verbovskii, G.D. (2021). Gig-Economy as a New Form of Market Relations. Innovatcionnaia ekonomika: perspektivy razvitija i sovershenstvovaniia [Innovative Economics: Prospects of Development and Improvement]. No. 1 (51), pp. 186-192, doi: 10.47581/2021/FA-07/IE/51/01.029 (In Russ.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3