Affiliation:
1. Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (MGIMO University)
Abstract
Motives and choices related to obtaining higher education represent a pressing issue that occupies its own niche in the research agenda of the sociology of education and related scientific disciplines. The purpose of the article is to reveal the specifics of the formation of different types of educational trajectories from the perspective of the motives of primary and secondary educational choices of students from top-rated universities. The research question was formulated around differences in goal setting and motivational and value bases of choice when constructing different types of university trajectories – linear and nonlinear.The collection of empirical information was carried out through interviews with 40 students achieved the higher GPA from Moscow top-rated universities (MSU, MGIMO, HSE, MVTU, etc.). Informants described their subjective educational experience as a sequence of choices they made in the space of higher education.Analysis of students’ narratives made it possible to qualitatively differentiate between linear and nonlinear trajectories, as well as their subtypes, differing in their internal motivation and educational settings. The analysis identified common motivational reasons for choosing a university and majors at the “entrance” to higher education, as well as motives for secondary educational choice specific to different types of university trajectories — motives for keeping and motives for changing a specialty and university. In the informants’ narratives, choosing a university is described as a complex, multimotivated action, in which the motives of prestige, self-development, as well as social and utilitarian motives are highlighted. Educational choices related to keeping or changing the educational trajectory are determined by the desire to avoid risks and having a high level of satisfaction with studies in the case of linear trajectories and the desire to gain new educational experience, obtaining competencies that go beyond the scope of the specialty being studied, as well as environmental factors of the university in the case of non-linear tracks.It is shown that a qualitative research strategy allows the researchers to look at reflected educational choices from the perspective of their semantic content, which is especially in demand due to the growing trend towards individualization of the educational process. It is concluded that empirical knowledge about the motives and methods of shaping the educational trajectories of the current generation of students is necessary for the development of an effective social and educational environment of a modern university, focused on a student-centered approach to learning.
Publisher
Moscow Polytechnic University
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Education,Philosophy
Reference25 articles.
1. Konstantinovskii, D.L., Popova, E.S. (2022). [New Nature of Educational and Professional Trajectories of Young People]. In: Gorshkov, M.K. (Ed). Rossija reformirujushhajasja: ezhegodnik [Reforming Russia: yearbook]. Vol. 20. Moscow: Novyj Hronograf, pp. 379-399, doi: 10.19181/ezheg.2022.14 (In Russ.).
2. Aleshkovskii, I.A., Gasparishvili, A.T., Krukhmaleva, O.V., Narbut, N.P., Savina, N.E. (2023). Peculiarities of the Formation of Educational Trajectories of Russian Students: Assessment and Opportunities. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. Vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 137-155, doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-4-137-155 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
3. Khavenson, T.E., Chirkina, T.A. (2018). Effectively Maintained Inequality: The Choice of Postsecondary Educational Trajectory in Russia. Ekonomicheskaya Sotsiologiya = Journal of Economic Sociology. Vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 66-89, doi: 10.17323/1726-3247-2018-5-66-89 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
4. Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J.C. (1970). La Reproduction. Elements pour une Theorie du Systeme D’enseignement [The Reproduction: Elements for a Theory of the Educational System] . Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit, 284 p. (Russian Translation: ed. N.A. Shmatko, Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 2007, 267 p.).
5. Romanets, I.I., Verbovskii, G.D. (2021). Gig-Economy as a New Form of Market Relations. Innovatcionnaia ekonomika: perspektivy razvitija i sovershenstvovaniia [Innovative Economics: Prospects of Development and Improvement]. No. 1 (51), pp. 186-192, doi: 10.47581/2021/FA-07/IE/51/01.029 (In Russ.).