Abstract
Publication activity in modern society is presented as a driving force of scientific and technological development and as an indicator of university management reporting. The article is devoted to the study of approaches to determining the monetary value of a scientific publication, taking into account different behavior’s motives of researchers and teachers in higher education as authors. The methodological basis of the study was formed by concepts of creating a public good and financial good, concepts of scientific productivity and academic remuneration, neoclassical and neoinstitutional economic theories, approaches to the implementation of state policy in the field of science and education in terms of stimulating scientific publications. Research methods: critical and comparative analysis, with the inclusion of three groups of methods: a) the study of direct and indirect authors’ motives and traps in the publication of scientific papers; b) asset evaluation methods; c) a combination of socio-economic campaigns for monetary evaluation of the results of scientific research. Asset valuation approaches have been adapted to assess the scientific publication’s value from the position of the author as a beneficiary. The theoretical and practical significance of the research lies in the contribution to the value dimension of scientific publications for their authors in the conditions of academic capitalism with potential opportunities to receive monetary income from the results of their research.
Publisher
Moscow Polytechnic University
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Education,Philosophy
Reference33 articles.
1. Martin, B.R., Тang, P. (2007). The Benefits from Publicly Funded Research. Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex. Paper no. 161. 45 р.
2. Bornmann, L. (2013). What is Societal Impact of Research and How Can It Be Assessed? A Literature Survey. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. Vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 217-233, doi: 10.1002/asi.22803
3. Foucault, M. (2016). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press, 383 р., ISBN: 978-5-91103-302-6
4. Hallonsten, O. (2021). Stop Evaluating Science: A Historical-Sociological Argument. Social Science Information. Vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 7-26, doi: 10.1177/0539018421992204
5. Litvinova, L.I. (2018). Measurement and Factors of Academic Productivity. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. Vol. 22, no. 1 (113), pp. 61-75., doi: 10.15826/umpa.2018.01.006 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Effective Contract in Higher Education: Intentions and Outcomes;Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia;2023-04-18