Development of Innovative Activity of University Teachers: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives

Author:

Gut Yu. N.1ORCID,Tursunov L. E.2ORCID,Lanskikh M. V.3ORCID,Akhmedova Sh. B.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Samarkand State University named after Sh. Rashidov (SamGU named after Sh. Rashidova); Federal Scientific Center for Psychological and Interdisciplinary Research (Psychological Institute)

2. Samarkand State University named after Sh. Rashidov (SamGU named after Sh. Rashidov)

3. Belgorod State National Research University (NRU “BelSU”)

Abstract

In the era of the development of innovative technologies, the processes taking place in universities determine new requirements for the personality and professional competence of a teacher. A modern teacher is not just a transmitter of information and accumulated experience, but also a person who understands the essence of modern life and strives to harmoniously fit into existing realities, while focused on changing his consciousness, worldview and openness to everything new. In this connection, the problem of the teacher’s psychological readiness for innovation, as a component of his professionalism, is relevant. The purpose of the study: to study the peculiarities of readiness for innovation and identify the main barriers preventing the development of innovations among university teachers; based on the results obtained, to develop a methodology for the development of innovative activity of teachers. The study involved 156 university teachers aged 27 to 40 years with 1 to 15 years of work experience at the university. The study revealed that about a third of teachers show a low level of readiness for innovation. Only 22% of teachers have a high level of innovation activity. In the structure of readiness for innovation, they will have a motivational component, indicating a desire for success in achieving their goals. It was also found that the leading factors hindering the innovative activity of teachers are: insufficient awareness of possible innovative activities at the university; the belief that only the traditional education system is effective; lack of assistance in mastering innovations in the team, as well as fear of negative performance results. The systematization of the theoretical and empirical data obtained made it possible to develop a methodology for the development of innovative activity of university teachers, consisting of two main directions: environmental – features of the scientific and educational innovative environment; subjective – motivation, level of training and personal characteristics of teachers. 

Publisher

Moscow Polytechnic University

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Education,Philosophy

Reference27 articles.

1. Aldahdouh, T.Z., Korhonen, V., Nokelainen, P. (2019). What Contributes to Individual Innovativeness? A Multilevel Perspective. International Journal of Innovation Studies. Vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 23-39, doi: 10.1016/j.ijis.2019.06.001

2. Latukha, O.A., Pushkarev, Yu.V. (2012). [Innovative Activity of a Modern University: Development Trends]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University]. No. 4 (8), pp. 44-51. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_17899160_64833810.pdf (accessed 01.08.2023). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

3. Abakumova, N.N., Lei, G. (2023). [Categories “Tradition” and ”Innovation” in the Scientific and Educational Space of the University]. Filosofiya obrazovaniya [Philosophy of Education]. Vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 18-31, doi: 10.15372/PHE202301022 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).

4. Minzaripov, R.G., Fakhrutdinova, A.V., Abakumova, N.N., Xu, S., Terentyeva, I.V. (2021). Scientific/Educational Communication and Leadership ARWU versus MosIUR. RPGE – Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional, Araraquara. Vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 557-566, doi: 10.22633/rpge.v25iesp.1.14996

5. Yagolkovsky, S.R. (2011). Psixologiya innovacij: podxody`, modeli, processy` [Psychology of Innovation: Approaches, Models, Processes]. Moscow: Higher School of Economics; 272 p. ISBN: 978-5-7598-0771-1. (In Russ.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3