Affiliation:
1. Samarkand State University named after Sh. Rashidov (SamGU named after Sh. Rashidova); Federal Scientific Center for Psychological and Interdisciplinary Research (Psychological Institute)
2. Samarkand State University named after Sh. Rashidov (SamGU named after Sh. Rashidov)
3. Belgorod State National Research University (NRU “BelSU”)
Abstract
In the era of the development of innovative technologies, the processes taking place in universities determine new requirements for the personality and professional competence of a teacher. A modern teacher is not just a transmitter of information and accumulated experience, but also a person who understands the essence of modern life and strives to harmoniously fit into existing realities, while focused on changing his consciousness, worldview and openness to everything new. In this connection, the problem of the teacher’s psychological readiness for innovation, as a component of his professionalism, is relevant. The purpose of the study: to study the peculiarities of readiness for innovation and identify the main barriers preventing the development of innovations among university teachers; based on the results obtained, to develop a methodology for the development of innovative activity of teachers. The study involved 156 university teachers aged 27 to 40 years with 1 to 15 years of work experience at the university. The study revealed that about a third of teachers show a low level of readiness for innovation. Only 22% of teachers have a high level of innovation activity. In the structure of readiness for innovation, they will have a motivational component, indicating a desire for success in achieving their goals. It was also found that the leading factors hindering the innovative activity of teachers are: insufficient awareness of possible innovative activities at the university; the belief that only the traditional education system is effective; lack of assistance in mastering innovations in the team, as well as fear of negative performance results. The systematization of the theoretical and empirical data obtained made it possible to develop a methodology for the development of innovative activity of university teachers, consisting of two main directions: environmental – features of the scientific and educational innovative environment; subjective – motivation, level of training and personal characteristics of teachers.
Publisher
Moscow Polytechnic University
Reference27 articles.
1. Aldahdouh, T.Z., Korhonen, V., Nokelainen, P. (2019). What Contributes to Individual Innovativeness? A Multilevel Perspective. International Journal of Innovation Studies. Vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 23-39, doi: 10.1016/j.ijis.2019.06.001
2. Latukha, O.A., Pushkarev, Yu.V. (2012). [Innovative Activity of a Modern University: Development Trends]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University]. No. 4 (8), pp. 44-51. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_17899160_64833810.pdf (accessed 01.08.2023). (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
3. Abakumova, N.N., Lei, G. (2023). [Categories “Tradition” and ”Innovation” in the Scientific and Educational Space of the University]. Filosofiya obrazovaniya [Philosophy of Education]. Vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 18-31, doi: 10.15372/PHE202301022 (In Russ., abstract in Eng.).
4. Minzaripov, R.G., Fakhrutdinova, A.V., Abakumova, N.N., Xu, S., Terentyeva, I.V. (2021). Scientific/Educational Communication and Leadership ARWU versus MosIUR. RPGE – Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional, Araraquara. Vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 557-566, doi: 10.22633/rpge.v25iesp.1.14996
5. Yagolkovsky, S.R. (2011). Psixologiya innovacij: podxody`, modeli, processy` [Psychology of Innovation: Approaches, Models, Processes]. Moscow: Higher School of Economics; 272 p. ISBN: 978-5-7598-0771-1. (In Russ.).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献