The Potential of Silence in Education: Methodological and Didactic Prerequisites

Author:

Korol A. D.1

Affiliation:

1. Belarusian State University

Abstract

This paper investigates philosophical, cultural and didactic potential of silence in education. The author substantiates that in the world of ever-augmenting speaking, the student’s silence is manifested as a stage, when there is nothing to say for oneself. This is attributable to the monologue nature of education, the main meanings, goals and the content of which is to convey the multicultural experience of mankind to a “monocultural” student. At the same time, there is a huge potential for silence as competence whereby a student generates his new meanings, knowledge, questions. The paper presents a comparative analysis of the didactics of Eastern and Western cultures core parameters as creativity, dialogism, interactivity. The author concludes that despite the sufficiently large number of the silence phenomenon studies in pedagogy, they mainly affect the methodical le[1]vel. In reliance on philosophical, linguistic, psychosocial research, the article originally examines the methodological foundations of the design and implementation of the didactics of silence. Particular attention is paid to the links between silence, “questioning” and heuristics. It is indicated that silence in teaching factors into exponential development and the formation of such future competencies as creativity, communication, and the affective sphere.

Publisher

Moscow Polytechnic University

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Education

Reference37 articles.

1. Baudrillard, J. (1981). Simulacres et Simulation. Paris : Ed Galilée, 230 p. (Russian edition: transl. by A. Kachalov, Moscow: Postum Publ., 2015. 238 p.).

2. Korol, A.D. (2009). Dialog v obrazovanii:evristicheskiy aspekt [Dialogue in Education: A Heuristic Aspect]. Moscow : Eidos; Ivanovo : Yunona, 259 p. (In Russ.).

3. Hesse, H. (1951). Siddhartha. Binghamton, N.Y : Vail-Ballou Press, 151 p. (Russian edition: transl. by G.B. Notkin, St. Petersburg : Azbuka-klassika, 2003. 186 p.).

4. Korol, A.D. (2013). Stereotip kak obrazovatelnaja problema [Stereotype as an Educational Problem]. Voprosy filosofii [Philosophy Issues], No. 10, pp. 156-162. (In Russ.).

5. Tolstoy, L.N. (1956). Polnoe sobranie sochineniy. V 100 t. T. 45. Put zhizni [Complete Works. In 100 vols. Vol. 45. Way of Life]. N.N. Guseva, I.I. Gorbunova-Posadova (Eds.). Moscow: Goslitizdat Publ., 601 p. (In Russ.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3