Development of the Individual and Peer Study Skills Scale

Author:

Fer Seval1ORCID,Ertuna Levent2ORCID,Uysal İbrahim3ORCID,Gürer Melih Derya3ORCID,Debbağ Murat4ORCID,Karataş Fatih5ORCID,Karadeniz Derya6ORCID,Kuzgun Yasemin7ORCID,Genç Esma8ORCID,Cırık İlker9ORCID,Yıldız Sevilay3ORCID,Pehlivan Hülya1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ

2. SAKARYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ

3. ABANT İZZET BAYSAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ

4. BARTIN ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ

5. NEVŞEHİR ÜNİVERSİTESİ, YABANCI DİLLER YÜKSEKOKULU

6. İNÖNÜ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ

7. HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ

8. MARMARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ATATÜRK EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ

9. MİMAR SİNAN GÜZEL SANATLAR ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FEN-EDEBİYAT FAKÜLTESİ

Abstract

Learners can demonstrate the performance expected of them in study skills individually or with peers. The literature shows that there is no customization of study skills, such as working individually or with peers. Therefore, there is a need for measurement tools that can identify the needs of learners while determining their study skills for both individual and peer activities. This study aims to develop a scale to measure university students' individual and peer study skills. The research was conducted using an exploratory correlational design, and data was collected from two different samples for pilot and validation applications. The pilot and validation application sample comprised 470 and 323 teacher candidates. Item analysis for item validity and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) for construct validity were conducted on the pilot study data. Before the EFA, optimal parallel analysis was used to examine the scale's dimensionality. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted on the validation data to gather evidence for construct validity. The optimal parallel analysis suggested a two-dimensional structure for the scale. As a result of the EFA, a two-dimensional construct with 28 items, consisting of 16 and 12 items in each dimension, explained 58.8% of the variance. The first dimension of the scale was named peer study skills, and the second was named individual study skills. Item analysis revealed that the discrimination of the items in both dimensions was sufficient. The CFA results confirmed the two-factor construct of the scale. The trial and validation studies data showed that the reliability coefficients, considering both dimensions individually and the overall scale, indicated that the scores are reliable.

Funder

TÜBİTAK

Publisher

Gaziosmanpasa University

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3