Prostate-specific antigen kinetics parameters are predictive of positron emission tomography features worsening in patients with biochemical relapse after prostate cancer treatment with radical intent: Results from a longitudinal cohort study-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Prostate-specific antigen kinetics parameters are predictive of positron emission tomography features worsening in patients with biochemical relapse after prostate cancer treatment with radical intent: Results from a longitudinal cohort study

Published:2013-11-21 Issue:3 Volume:48 Page:259-267
ISSN:2168-1805
Container-title:Scandinavian Journal of Urology
language:en
Short-container-title:Scandinavian Journal of Urology

Author:

Gacci Mauro,Cai Tommaso,Siena Giampaolo,Minervini Andrea,Torshizi Mozhgan Fayaz,Bartolini Matteo,Giannì Gianluca,Saieva Calogero,Ceroti Mauro,Detti Beatrice,Livi Lorenzo,Pupi Alberto,Carini Marco

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Urology,Nephrology

Link

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.3109/21681805.2013.846936

Reference27 articles.

1. Hazard rates for progression after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer

2. Natural History of Progression After PSA Elevation Following Radical Prostatectomy

3. EAU Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Clinically Localised Disease

4. Management of asymptomatic rise in prostatic-specific antigen in patients with prostate cancer

5. PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN ONLY PROGRESSION OF PROSTATE CANCER

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Cancers de la prostate;Médecine Nucléaire;2019-01

2. Positron emission tomography in imaging evaluation of staging, restaging, treatment response, and prognosis in prostate cancer;Abdominal Radiology;2016-01-06

3. Advances in imaging modalities in prostate cancer;Current Opinion in Oncology;2015-05

4. Prognostic Utility of PET in Prostate Cancer;PET Clinics;2015-04

5. 18F-fluoromethylcholine or 18F-fluoroethylcholine pet for prostate cancer imaging: which is better? A literature revision;Nuclear Medicine and Biology;2015-04