Current Problems in Devices Evaluation: Some Solutions

Author:

Wallin Richard F.1

Affiliation:

1. North American Science Associates, Inc. 2261 Tracy Road Northwood, OH 43619

Abstract

Medical devices and their component materials are potential sources of toxins that may produce undesirable local or systemic effects when used clinically. Federal regulations thus require manufacturers to establish the safety of their products. Until 1987, FDA provided few specific guidelines for testing medical devices, although many standardized testing methods had been placed in use by industry. Now, proposed guidelines exist, but device manufacturers still face significant problems that are similar to those encountered when testing drugs and chemicals: (1) a strategy for testing must be established to make best use of screening methods, to develop parallel information about various families of products, and to make best use of resources, (2) test articles must be selected to represent finished products, not prototype formulations, (3) sample preparation must be appropriate and relate to product use conditions, (4) test methods that are inappropriate based on end use of a product must be avoided, (5) all potential sources of toxins must be taken into account, including raw materials, processing and manufacturing aids, and sterilization processes, and (6) Good Laboratory Practices must receive appropriate attention. In vitro alternatives to animal test methods are used widely for primary evaluation of biocompatibility, but suitable animal models are not yet available for preclinical evaluation of some devices.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Toxicology

Reference10 articles.

1. Agar Diffusion Method for Toxicity Screening of Plastics on Cultured Cell Monolayers

2. The New Field of Plastics Toxicology - Methods and Results

3. Tissue Culture Method for Screening Toxicity of Plastic Materials to be Used in Medical Practice

4. 4. United States Pharmacopeia Xxi. (1984). Biological tests—Plastics and elastomeric closures for injections. Easton, PA: Mack Printing Company, pp. 1198, 1235.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3