Casemix and Affective Disorders: A Comparison of Private and Public Psychiatric Systems

Author:

Goldney Robert D.1,Kent Penny1,Elzinga Robert H.2

Affiliation:

1. University of Adelaide, The Adelaide Clinic, Gilberton, South, Australia, Australia

2. Department of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Clinical Information Evaluation Unit, South Australian Mental Health Services, Eastwood, South, Australia, Australia

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether there is a difference in length of stay for patients with affective disorders between private and public psychiatric hospitals. Method: The casemix Australian national diagnosis-related group (AN-DRG) diagnoses of all inpatient separations from private and public psychiatric hospitals in South Australia for 1 year were abstracted from records. The average length of stay for patients with affective disorders was calculated. Results: There was no significant difference in the average length of stay for patients with affective disorders treated in private and public psychiatric hospitals. Conclusions: These results should allay fears that the treatment of patients with affective disorders in any particular treatment setting will be compromised by the introduction of casemix.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,General Medicine

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Excess Cost of Depression in South Australia: A Population-Based Study;Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry;2003-06

2. The Mental Health Care Context and Patient Characteristics;The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research;2002-08

3. The mental health care context and patient characteristics: Implications for provider job satisfaction;The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research;2002-08

4. Pathways and Outcomes of Psychiatric Care: Does it Depend on who you are, or what you've Got?;Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry;2000-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3