Co-authorship Network Analysis of Medical Images Researchers with Emphasis on Micro and Macro Metrics

Author:

Osareh FaridehORCID,Salehi Zahabi SalehORCID,Akbarzadeh FaridehORCID

Abstract

Background: Co-authorship is used to analyze scientific collaboration and identify patterns of collaboration among researchers. Considering the role of medical images in the field of health, it is necessary to identify the cooperation network between authors in order to strengthen research relations between them. Objectives: The purpose of this study is to map and analyze the network structure of all authors of published articles in the field of medical images. Methods: This research is applied-descriptive and was done with a scientometric approach and social network analysis. The search strategy was implemented in the core collection of the Web of Science database Clarivate Analytics Institute. In this study, 37190 articles in the three time periods of 1991 - 2000, 2001 - 2010, and 2011 - 2020 were reviewed. Data extraction, matrix construction, and mapping of the co-authorship network were performed using Bibexcel, Gephi, and Vosviewer software. Results: During the period under review, the pattern of authors’ participation changed from 2 authors to 3 authors and 4 authors. In the years 1991 - 2000, the link strongest with values of 18, 16, and 14 were “Dipaola, R.”, “Frouin, F.” and “Nishikawa, R. M.”, respectively. The co-authorship network consisted of seventy clusters in the years 2001 - 2010, and its strongest members were “Alkadhi, Hatem” and “Leschka, Sebastian” with a total link strength of 100. The co-authorship network in 2011 - 2020 consisted of 60 clusters and the link strongest with values of 58, 55, and 50 belonged to “Van Ginneken, Bram”, “Herrmann, Ken”, and “Ourselin, Sebastien”, respectively. In 2001 - 2010, the network density and clustering coefficient were 0.007 and 0.994, respectively. Conclusions: In all 3 decades, the co-authorship network is incoherent. In the 2001 - 2010-decade, 7% of the potential relationships in the co-authorship network were realized. Dispersion in the co-authorship network researchers in the field of medical images is evident. In addition, the amount of density and clustering coefficient of the co-authorship network indicates the greater willingness of authors to collaborate in this decade. The results of this research can be used to expand and strengthen scientific cooperation between researchers.

Publisher

Briefland

Subject

Literature and Literary Theory,History,Cultural Studies

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3