The Impact of Spontaneous versus Indicated Preterm Birth on Neonatal Outcomes among Extremely Premature Neonates

Author:

Townsel Courtney1,Hesson Ashley M.1,Greco Patricia1,Kazzi Nayla G.2ORCID,Treadwell Marjorie C.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, University of Texas-Houston, Houston, Texas

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to investigate whether neonatal morbidity differs in spontaneous compared with indicated preterm births in extremely premature neonates. Study Design This is a retrospective cohort study including births ≤28 weeks at a single institution from 2011 to 2020. Births were categorized as either medically indicated or spontaneous preterm deliveries. The primary outcome was inhospital mortality and serious morbidity in survivors. t-tests, Fisher's exact tests, chi-square tests, and logistic regression models were utilized as appropriate. p < 0.05 was significant. Results Two hundred and twenty-seven births were included, with two-thirds representing spontaneous births (65.6%, 149/227) and one-third categorized as medically indicated births (34.4%, 78/227). Inhospital mortality was more common in the spontaneous preterm birth group (p = 0.04), while inhospital morbidity did not significantly vary between the medically indicated and spontaneous birth groups (p = 0.32). There was no difference in inhospital morbidity or mortality by maternal race. In multivariate models of inhospital morbidity and mortality, gestational age was the only significant predictor of adverse outcomes. Conclusion Despite inhospital mortality being more common in spontaneous preterm births, inhospital mortality and significant morbidity are best accounted for by gestational age alone. Key Points

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference8 articles.

1. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth;R L Goldenberg;Lancet,2008

2. Preterm birth: now the leading cause of child death worldwide;J E Lawn;Sci Transl Med,2014

3. Epidemiology of preterm birth;S E Purisch;Semin Perinatol,2017

4. Neonatal outcomes differ after spontaneous and indicated preterm birth;M J Stout;Am J Perinatol,2018

5. Gender differences in respiratory morbidity and mortality of preterm neonates;C D Townsel;Front Pediatr,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3