Intraductal radiofrequency ablation plus biliary stent versus stent alone for malignant biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

de Oliveira Veras Matheus1ORCID,de Moura Diogo Turiani Hourneaux1,McCarty Thomas R.2ORCID,de Oliveira Guilherme Henrique Peixoto1ORCID,Gomes Rômulo Sérgio Araújo1,Landim Davi Lucena1,Nunes Felipe Giacobo1,Franzini Tomazo Antônio Prince1,Lera dos Santos Marcos Eduardo1ORCID,Bernardo Wanderley Marques3,de Moura Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux1

Affiliation:

1. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of Sao Paulo Hospital of Clinics, Sao Paulo, Brazil

2. Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States

3. Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo Hospital of Clinics, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Abstract

Abstract Background and study aims Recurrent biliary stent occlusion and tumor ingrowth remain a major concern among patients with malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) with significant impact on patient morbidity and survival. Intraductal radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has emerged as a promising treatment that seeks to extend stent patency. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of RFA on overall survival (OS) and stent patency among patients with unresectable MBO. Methods A comprehensive search of electronic databases was performed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing RFA plus biliary stent (RFA+S) versus biliary stent alone (S-alone). Outcomes assessed included overall survival, stent patency, and adverse events (AEs) with mean difference (MD) calculated from pooled proportions. Subgroup analyses were performed for hilar strictures and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Results Six RCTs (n=439 patients) were included and demonstrated improved survival among patients who received RFA+S (MD 85.80 days; 95% confidence interval [CI] 35.02–136.58; I2=97%; P <0.0009). The pooled MD for total stent patency was 22.25 days (95% CI 17.38–61.87; I2=97%; P=0.27). There was no difference in AEs between RFA+S vs S-alone (P >0.05). On subgroup analyses, RFA+S was associated with improved stent patency (MD 76.73 days; 95% CI 50.11–103.34; I2=67%; P <0.01) and OS (MD 83.14 (95% CI 29.52–136.77; I2=97%; P <0.01] for CCA. For hilar strictures, stent patency was improved among patients with RFA+S [MD 83.71 days (95% CI 24.85–142.56; I2=84%; P <0.01]. Conclusions RFA+S improved OS in the treatment of MBO when compared with S-alone. Moreover, the RFA therapy prolonged stent patency in hilar strictures and CCA, with similar rates of AEs.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3