Interobserver agreement of the Paris and simplified classifications of superficial colonic lesions: a Western study

Author:

Cocomazzi Francesco12,Gentile Marco1,Perri Francesco1,Merla Antonio1,Bossa Fabrizio1,Piazzolla Mariano21,Ippolito Antonio1,Terracciano Fulvia1,Giuliani Arcangela Patrizia1,Cubisino Rossella1,Marra Antonella1,Carparelli Sonia1,Mileti Alessia21,Paolillo Rosa21,Fontana Andrea3,Copetti Massimiliano3,Di Leo Alfredo2,Andriulli Angelo1

Affiliation:

1. Fondazione “Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza”, IRCCS, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Units, San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy

2. University of Bari, Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Bari, Italy

3. Unit of Biostatistics, Fondazione “Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza”, IRCCS, San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy

Abstract

Abstract Background and study aims The Paris classification of superficial colonic lesions has been widely adopted, but a simplified description that subgroups the shape into pedunculated, sessile/flat and depressed lesions has been proposed recently. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and inter-rater agreement among 13 Western endoscopists for the two classification systems. Methods Seventy video clips of superficial colonic lesions were classified according to the two classifications, and their size estimated. The interobserver agreement for each classification was assessed using both Cohen k and AC1 statistics. Accuracy was taken as the concordance between the standard morphology definition and that made by participants. Sensitivity analyses investigated agreement between trainees (T) and staff members (SM), simple or mixed lesions, distinct lesion phenotypes, and for laterally spreading tumors (LSTs). Results Overall, the interobserver agreement for the Paris classification was substantial (κ = 0.61; AC1 = 0.66), with 79.3 % accuracy. Between SM and T, the values were superimposable. For size estimation, the agreement was 0.48 by the κ-value, and 0.50 by AC1. For single or mixed lesions, κ-values were 0.60 and 0.43, respectively; corresponding AC1 values were 0.68 and 0.57. Evaluating the several different polyp subtypes separately, agreement differed significantly when analyzed by the k-statistics (0.08–0.12) or the AC1 statistics (0.59–0.71). Analyses of LSTs provided a κ-value of 0.50 and an AC1 score of 0.62, with 77.6 % accuracy. The simplified classification outperformed the Paris classification: κ = 0.68, AC1 = 0.82, accuracy = 91.6 %. Conclusions Agreement is often measured with Cohen’s κ, but we documented higher levels of agreement when analyzed with the AC1 statistic. The level of agreement was substantial for the Paris classification, and almost perfect for the simplified system.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Gastroenterology,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference29 articles.

1. Nonpolypoid neoplastic lesions of the colorectal mucosa;S Kudo;Gastrointest Endosc,2008

2. esophagus, stomach, and colon. November 30 to December 1, 2002;The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions;Gastrointest Endosc,2003

3. Update on the Paris classification of superficial neoplastic lesions in the digestive tract;Endoscopic Classification Review Group;Endoscopy,2005

4. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline;M Ferlitsch;Endoscopy,2017

5. Endoscopic removal of colorectal lesions – Recommendations by the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer;T Kaltenbach;Gastrointest Endosc,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3