Affiliation:
1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia
2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School and Sentara Health Research Center, Norfolk, Virginia
3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
Abstract
Objective The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists suggests that an electrocardiogram is an acceptable first-line test. We sought to examine whether an electrocardiogram is a sufficient screening tool to identify echocardiogram-diagnosed left ventricular hypertrophy. We also sought to determine risk factors associated with left ventricular hypertrophy.
Study Design This was a retrospective cohort study of pregnant individuals with chronic hypertension who delivered at 20 weeks' gestation or greater at a tertiary care center. Analyses were limited to individuals who had both electrocardiogram and echocardiogram during pregnancy. Left ventricular hypertrophy was diagnosed using the American Society of Echocardiography guidelines. Maternal demographics and electrocardiogram results were compared between individuals with left ventricular hypertrophy and those without left ventricular hypertrophy. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of the electrocardiogram to identify left ventricular hypertrophy were also calculated. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated, controlling for covariates.
Results Of 172 individuals, 60 (34.9%) had left ventricular hypertrophy. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of the electrocardiogram to identify echocardiogram-diagnosed left ventricular hypertrophy was 18.3% (95% CI: 9.5–30.4), 91.1% (95% CI: 84.2–95.6), 2.05 (95% CI: 0.93–4.56), and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.78–1.02), respectively. Compared with individuals without left ventricular hypertrophy, those with left ventricular hypertrophy were more likely to have hypertension of 4 years' duration or longer (aOR = 4.01; 95% CI: 1.71–9.42), unknown duration of hypertension (aOR = 4.66; 95% CI: 1.28–17.04), and higher body mass index (aOR = 1.04; 95% CI: 1.01–1.07). After adjusting for covariates, left ventricular hypertrophy by electrocardiogram was not associated with actual left ventricular hypertrophy (aOR = 2.59; 95% CI: 0.94–7.10).
Conclusion Electrocardiogram was not a sufficient test for identifying left ventricular hypertrophy in pregnant individuals with chronic hypertension. We suggest an echocardiogram evaluation for all individuals with chronic hypertension.
Key Points
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference12 articles.
1. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 203. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists;Chronic Hypertension in Pregnancy;Obstet Gynecol,2019
2. Perinatal outcomes associated with abnormal cardiac remodeling in women with treated chronic hypertension;A M Ambia;Am J Obstet Gynecol,2018
3. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 212: pregnancy and heart disease;American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Presidential Task Force on Pregnancy and Heart Disease and Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics;Obstet Gynecol,2019
4. Left ventricular remodeling and diastolic function in chronic hypertensive pregnant women;C M Marcolan Quitete;Pregnancy Hypertens,2015
5. Echocardiographic assessment of structural and hemodynamic changes in hypertension-related pregnancy;M J Kim;J Cardiovasc Ultrasound,2016