The Clinical Outcomes of Measured Resection and Gap Balancing Techniques in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis

Abstract

Abstract Background At present, the clinical efficacy of measured resection (MR) and gap balancing (GB) techniques in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still controversial. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome indexes of the two surgical methods through a meta-analysis. Methods The literature was systematically searched on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WANFANG, Weipu (VIP), and China Biomedical Literature (CBM) electronic databases inception until June 12, 2022. RevMan 5.3 software (the Nordic Cochrane Center, the Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark) was used to analyze all data of this study. The Cochrane risk bias assessment tool is a risk bias evaluation criterion recommended by the Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews. Results Eleven studies involving 1268 knees in total were included. The main outcome indexes showed that the Knee Society Score (KSS) knee score (MD: −1.40; 95% CI: −2.57 to −0.22; p = 0.02) and KSS knee function score (MD: −3.11; 95% CI: −3.72 to −2.50; p < 0.001) in the GB group were higher 1 year after operation, while femoral component rotation angle (FCRA; MD: −0.75; 95% CI: −1.34 to −0.07; p = 0.03) and the osteotomy volume of the posterior medial femoral condyle (MD: −0.76; 95% CI; −1.13 to −0.38; p < 0.001) were greater in the GB group. In addition, there was no significant difference in the joint line change (MD: −0.03; 95% CI: −0.07 to 0.01; p = 0.16) between the two groups. Secondary outcome results showed that the knee joint range of motion (ROM) in 3 months, and the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score after 1 year were better in the GB group. However, the operation time of the MR group was shorter. In addition, this study revealed no significant differences in post-complications between these two groups. Conclusion Although the GB technique may not provide better radiographic results or reduce the complication rate, the recovery of joint function showed earlier improvement.