Intrapartum Risk Factors and Prediction of Obstetric Hemorrhage–Related Morbidity

Author:

Abbas Diana12ORCID,Wang Michelle J.2ORCID,Claus Lindsey1,Alexander Megan1,Srivastava Akanksha1,Young Sara1,Tummala Swetha1,Iverson Ronald12,Yarrington Christina12,Comfort Ashley12

Affiliation:

1. Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to assess whether inclusion of intrapartum risk factors improves our obstetric hemorrhage risk stratification tool in predicting obstetric hemorrhage, transfusion, and related severe morbidity. Study Design This is a retrospective cohort study using all live deliveries at a single institution over a 2-year period (n = 5,332). Obstetric hemorrhage risk factors, hemorrhage burden, and severe maternal morbidity index outcomes were assessed through chart abstraction. Hemorrhage risk was assessed at (1) “time of admission” through chart abstraction and (2) “predelivery” by calculation after inclusion of all abstracted intrapartum risk factors. Admission high risk was compared with predelivery high risk for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio in predicting obstetric hemorrhage, obstetric hemorrhage requiring transfusion, and obstetric hemorrhage–related severe morbidity. Significance levels were calculated using descriptive statistical methods including chi-squared tests and McNemar's tests. Results The sensitivities of the risk assessment tool using admission risk classification for high-risk patients is 25% for obstetric hemorrhage, 37% for obstetric hemorrhage requiring transfusion, and 22% for obstetric hemorrhage–related severe morbidity. After intrapartum factor inclusion, the sensitivities increase to 55% for obstetric hemorrhage, 59% for obstetric hemorrhage requiring transfusion, and 47% for obstetric hemorrhage–related severe morbidity. This “predelivery” risk assessment is significantly more sensitive across all three end points (p < 0.001 for all three outcomes). While the positive likelihood ratios for obstetric hemorrhage are equal on admission and predelivery (2.10 on admission and predelivery), they increase after intrapartum factor inclusion for obstetric hemorrhage requiring transfusion and obstetric hemorrhage–related severe morbidity (on admission, 2.74 and 1.6, respectively, and predelivery: 4.57 and 3.58, respectively). Conclusion Inclusion of intrapartum risk factors increases the accuracy of this obstetric hemorrhage risk stratification tool in predicting patients requiring hemorrhage management with transfusion and obstetric hemorrhage–related severe morbidity. Key Points

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference15 articles.

1. Vital signs: pregnancy-related deaths, united states, 2011–2015, and strategies for prevention, 13 states, 2013–2017;E E Petersen;MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep,2019

2. Severe maternal morbidity among delivery and postpartum hospitalizations in the United States;W M Callaghan;Obstet Gynecol,2012

3. National partnership for maternal safety: consensus bundle on obstetric hemorrhage;E K Main;Obstet Gynecol,2015

4. Clinical validation of risk stratification criteria for peripartum hemorrhage;A J Dilla;Obstet Gynecol,2013

5. Obstetric hemorrhage outcomes by intrapartum risk stratification at a single tertiary care center;S A Hussain;Cureus,2019

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Resuscitation in Obstetric Hemorrhage: “Less Is More”;Recent Updates in Intensive Care Medicine [Working Title];2024-06-05

2. Postpartum Haemorrhage Risk Prediction Model Developed by Machine Learning Algorithms: A Single-Centre Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Data;Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology;2024-03-06

3. Improving Health Care Responses to Obstetric Hemorrhage;Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology;2023-05-05

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3