Affiliation:
1. Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
2. Key Laboratory of Thrombosis and Haemostasis of the Ministry of Health, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
3. Collaborative Innovation Centre of Haematology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
4. Institute of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
5. State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
Abstract
AbstractDefibrotide has been approved in several geographic jurisdictions for the treatment of hepatic veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS) for years. However, available data on efficacy and safety for its use in VOD are contrasting. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of defibrotide in the treatment of hepatic VOD/SOS post-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). PubMed and Embase were searched for studies regarding the efficacy and safety of defibrotide in VOD patients. Survival rate at day + 100 post-HSCT (D + 100 SR), as well as the prognosis, comprising complete response (CR), adverse events including ≥1 adverse event (≥1 AE), hemorrhage, and serious adverse events (SAEs), were pooled using a random effect model. Sixteen studies involving 3,002 participants were included. Pooled estimates for overall D + 100 SR as well as rate of CR, ≥1 AE, hemorrhage, SAEs in VOD patients post-HSCT were 58% (95% CI: 54–62%), 57% (95% CI: 45–68%), 65% (95% CI: 54–75%), 16% (95% CI: 5–27%), 53% (95% CI: 51–55%), respectively, and were 44% (95% CI: 39–48%), 39% (95% CI: 28–50%), 88% (95% CI: 71–100%), 42% (95% CI: 30–55%), 58% (95% CI: 52–64%), respectively, in severe VOD (sVOD) patients. Hemorrhage and hypotension were the most common AEs. Current evidence suggests that defibrotide improves the D + 100 SR and CR in VOD/sVOD patients following HSCT. However, the results of this review/meta-analysis were mainly based on data from observational studies, potentially subject to selection bias. Consequently, higher quality randomized control trials and larger prospective cohort studies are warranted.
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Hematology