Simulation in Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Fellowship Programs

Author:

Sawyer Taylor1,Stavroudis Theodora A.2,Ades Anne3,Dadiz Rita4,Dammann Christiane E. L.5,Halamek Louis P.6,Moussa Ahmed7,Soghier Lamia8,Gupta Arika9,Aliaga Sofia10,Umoren Rachel1,French Heather3,

Affiliation:

1. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington

2. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, Fetal and Neonatal Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California

3. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

4. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York

5. Division of Newborn Medicine, Floating Hospital for Children at Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts

6. Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California

7. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Sainte-Justine Hospital University Center, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada

8. Department of Neonatology, Children's National Health System, Washington, District of Columbia

9. Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois

10. Department of Pediatrics, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Abstract

Abstract Objective This study aimed to investigate the use of simulation in neonatal-perinatal medicine (NPM) fellowship programs. Study Design This was a cross-sectional survey of program directors (PDs) and simulation educators in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accredited NPM fellowship programs. Results Responses were received from 59 PDs and 52 simulation educators, representing 60% of accredited programs. Of responding programs, 97% used simulation, which most commonly included neonatal resuscitation (94%) and procedural skills (94%) training. The time and scope of simulation use varied significantly. The majority of fellows (51%) received ≤20 hours of simulation during training. The majority of PDs (63%) wanted fellows to receive >20 hours of simulation. Barriers to simulation included lack of faculty time, experience, funding, and curriculum. Conclusion While the majority of fellowship programs use simulation, the time and scope of fellow exposure to simulation experiences are limited. The creation of a standardized simulation curriculum may address identified barriers to simulation.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynaecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3