Universal Electrocardiographic Screening for Long QT Syndrome in Hospitalized Neonates

Author:

Kaemingk Bethany D.1ORCID,Ulrich Timothy J.2,Li Man3,Carey William A.1,Ellsworth Marc A.45

Affiliation:

1. Division of Neonatal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

2. Division of Neonatal–Perinatal Medicine, St. Luke's Health System, Boise, Idaho

3. Department of Information Technology, Multidisciplinary Epidemiology and Translational Research in Intensive Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

4. Division of Neonatology, Banner – University Medical Center Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona

5. Division of Neonatology, Cardon Children's Medical Center, Banner Health, Mesa, Arizona

Abstract

Objective Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is a known cause of unexpected death, leading some to recommend routine neonatal electrocardiographic (ECG) screening. We used continuous electronic heart rate corrected QT interval (QTc) monitoring to screen for interval prolongation in a cohort of hospitalized neonates to identify those at a risk of having LQTS. We hypothesized that this screening method would yield an acceptable positive predictive value (PPV). Study Design A cohort of 589 infants hospitalized in a level II neonatal intensive care unit were screened through continuous electronic QTc monitoring linked to an investigator-designed, computerized data sniffer. Screening was conducted from days-of-life 3 through 7 or until hospital discharge. The data sniffer alerted investigators for a 24-hour average QTc of ≥475 ms. Positively screened patients were further evaluated with 12-lead ECG. Results Positive screens were obtained in 5.6% of patients, all of whom had negative follow-up ECG testing (PPV = 0%). Furthermore, one-quarter of positively screened neonates underwent echocardiography based on ECG findings, none of which identified clinically relevant pathology. Conclusion Electronic monitoring of QTc in hospitalized neonates during the first week of life was not an efficient way to identify those at a risk of having LQTS. Conversely, screening triggered unnecessary testing.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3