Statement of the German Roentgen Society, German Society of Neuroradiology, and Society of German-speaking Pediatric Radiologists on Requirements for the Performance and Reporting of MR Imaging Examinations Outside of Radiology

Author:

Hunold Peter1ORCID,Bucher Andreas Michael2ORCID,Sandstede Jörn3ORCID,Janka Rolf4ORCID,Fritz Lars Benjamin5ORCID,Regier Marc6ORCID,Loose Reinhard7,Barkhausen Jörg8ORCID,Mentzel Hans-Joachim9ORCID,Zimmer Claus10ORCID,Antoch Gerald11ORCID, , ,

Affiliation:

1. FOKUS Radiologie & Nuklearmedizin, Göttingen und Heilbad Heiligenstadt

2. Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Frankfurt am Main

3. Radiologische Allianz, Hamburg

4. Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU); Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Radiologisches Institut, Erlangen

5. Rheinlandärzte, Willich

6. Radiologie München, München

7. Klinikum Nürnberg, Institut für Medizinische Physik, Nürnberg

8. Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Lübeck

9. Universitätsklinikum Jena, Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Sektion Kinderradiologie, Jena

10. Universitätsklinikum rechts der Isar der TU München, Abteilung für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Neuroradiologie, München

11. Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Medizinische Fakultät, Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Düsseldorf

Abstract

Background Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a very innovative, but at the same time complex and technically demanding diagnostic method in radiology. It plays an increasing role in high-quality and efficient patient management. Quality assurance in MRI is of utmost importance to avoid patient risks due to errors before and during the examination and when reporting the results. Therefore, MRI requires higher physician qualification and expertise than any other diagnostic imaging technique in medicine. This holds true for indication, performance of the examination itself, and in particular for image evaluation and writing of the report. In Germany, the radiologist is the only specialist who is systematically educated in all aspects of MRI during medical specialty training and who must document a specified, high number of examinations during this training. However, also non-radiologist physicians are increasingly endeavoring to conduct and bill MRI examinations on their own. Method In this position statement, the following aspects of quality assurance for MRI examinations and billing by radiologists and non-radiologist physician specialists are examined scientifically: Requirements for specialist physician training, MRI risks and contraindications, radiation protection in the case of non-ionizing radiation, application of MR contrast agents, requirements regarding image quality, significance of image artifacts and incidental findings, image evaluation and reporting, interdisciplinary communication and multiple-eyes principle, and impact on healthcare system costs. Conclusion The German Roentgen Society, German Society of Neuroradiology, and Society of German-speaking Pediatric Radiologists are critical with regard to MRI performance by non-radiologists in the interest of quality standards, patient welfare, and healthcare payers. The 24-month additional qualification in MRI as defined by the physician specialization regulations (Weiterbildungsordnung) through the German state medical associations (Landesärztekammern) is the only competence-based and quality-assured training program for board-certified specialist physicians outside radiology. This has to be required as the minimum standard for performance and reporting of MRI exams. Exclusively unstructured MRI training outside the physician specialization regulations has to be strictly rejected for reasons of patient safety. The performance and reporting of MRI examinations must be reserved for adequately trained and continuously educated specialist physicians. Key Points: Citation Format

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Reference38 articles.

1. MRI‐related FDA adverse event reports: A 10‐yr review;J G Delfino;Med Phys,2019

2. Positionspapier der Deutschen Röntgengesellschaft (DRG) zu MR-Untersuchungen bei Patienten mit Herzschrittmachern;T Sommer;Rofo,2015

3. MRT-Wechselwirkungen mit magnetisch aktivem und elektrisch leitfähigem Material;F Schick;Radiologe,2019

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3