Cartilage Conduction Hearing Aid Fitting in Clinical Practice

Author:

Nishimura Tadashi1,Hosoi Hiroshi2,Sugiuchi Tomoko3,Matsumoto Nozomu4,Nishiyama Takanori5,Kenichi Takano6,Sugimoto Satofumi7,Yazama Hiroaki8,Sato Takeshi9,Komori Masahiro10

Affiliation:

1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan

2. MBT(Medicine-Based Town) Institute, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan

3. Sugiuchi Clinic, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, Japan

4. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Higashi-ku Fukuoka, Japan

5. Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan

6. Department of Otolaryngology, Sapporo Medical University, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Japan

7. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Japan

8. Division of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan

9. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan

10. Department of Otolaryngology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Oko-cho, Nankoku-shi, Kochi, Japan

Abstract

Abstract Background Cartilage conduction hearing aids (CCHAs) were newly devised and spread fast in Japan since their launch in 2017. However, little knowledge is available for this new device. Purpose The aim of this study was to establish the knowledge of CCHAs and suggest their indication. Research Design Correlational study. Study Sample A total 256 patients were registered. Data Collection and Analysis The fitting of CCHAs was surveyed in nine institutions. The outcomes were assessed by audiometric tests. The patients were classified into seven groups, depending on the ear conditions. The clinical characteristics, assessment results, and purchase rates were compared among the groups. The assessment results of CCHAs were also compared with those of previously used hearing aids. Results Most patients who used CCHAs were classified into the bilateral closed (aural atresia or severe stenosis) ear (n = 65) or unilateral closed ear (n = 124) groups. The patients in these groups achieved good benefits that resulted in a high purchase rate. The bilateral continuous otorrhea group also supported a high purchase rate, although the benefits of CCHAs were not always excellent. In contrast, the purchase rate was poor in the patients who could use air conduction hearing aids (ACHAs) without absolute problems. As for using a CCHA as a contralateral routing of signals hearing aid, the benefits depended on the patients. Conclusions CCHAs are considered as a great option not only to the patients with closed ears but also to those who had difficulties in ACHAs usage.

Funder

JSPS KAKENHI

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Speech and Hearing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3