Affiliation:
1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, School of Dentistry, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
2. Private Practice, Rome, Italy
Abstract
AbstractThe purpose of this review was to analyze how the retraction and protection of lingual flap (LF+) could influence the incidence of lingual nerve injury (LNI) during third molar extraction, as compared with protocols that do not involve handling of lingual tissue (LF). A literature review was performed from the “Medline” and “Scopus” medical databases, using the keywords “lingual nerve” and “third molar surgery.” From the selected articles, the mean values for transitory and permanent LNI’s incidence were elaborated, taking into account the group treated with LF+ technique and the group treated with LF technique. Of 480 articles, 11 studies were included in the review. The LF+ group counted 3,866 surgeries and it resulted in a transitory LNI’s mean incidence of 2.98 ± 0.03% and a mean incidence of 0.1 ± 0.003% for permanent LNI. The LF group counted 5,938 surgeries with, respectively, 1.92 ± 0.02 and 0.49 ± 0.006% of transitory and permanent LNI’s incidence mean values. The results of this study suggest that the application of LF+ techniques reduces the risk of damage and injuries of lingual nerve.
Reference64 articles.
1. Litigation and the lingual nerve;D D Lydiatt;J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2003
2. Immediate or delayed retrieval of the displaced third molar: a review;D Di Nardo;J Clin Exp Dent,2019
3. Postoperative morbidity with mandibular third molar surgery: a comparison of two techniques;R J Middlehurst;J Oral Maxillofac Surg,1988
4. Iatrogenic injury to oral branches of the trigeminal nerve: records of 449 cases;S Hillerup;Clin Oral Investig,2007
5. Frequency of trigeminal nerve injuries following third molar removal;R C Robert;J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2005
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献