A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effect of Standardized Video Education on Prenatal Genetic Testing Choices: Uptake of Genetic Testing

Author:

Stortz Sharon K.1,Mulligan Sheila2,Snipes Marie3,Hippman Catriona4,Shridhar Nirupama Nini5,Stoll Katie6,Lutgendorf Monica A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, California

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Naval Hospital Camp Pendleton, Oceanside, California

3. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Kenyon College, Gambier, Ohio

4. Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

5. Washington State Department of Health, Tumwater, Washington

6. Genetic Support Foundation, Olympia, Washington

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to assess the use of a standardized prenatal genetic testing educational video and its effects on patient uptake of prenatal testing, patient knowledge, decisional conflict, and decisional regret. Study Design This was an IRB-approved randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized to intervention (standardized video education) or control (no video education). The video education group viewed a 5-minute educational video on genetic testing options, and the control group did not review the video. Both groups answered validated questionnaires to assess maternal knowledge (Maternal Serum Screening Knowledge Questionnaire [MSSK]), conflict (Decisional Conflict Scale [DCS]), and regret (Decisional Regret Scale [DRS]). The primary outcome was genetic testing uptake; secondary outcomes were knowledge-based test score, and level of decisional conflict and regret. Results We enrolled 210 patients between 2016 and 2020, with 208 patients randomized, 103 patients in the video education group and 105 patients in the control group. Four patients were excluded from the video education group for missing data. Video education was associated with a 39% lower chance of prenatal testing compared with patients who did not receive video education, (odds ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.16–0.92). Patients in the video education group had higher mean MSSKQ scores by 2.9 points (8.5 vs. 5.7, p < 0.001), lower Decisional Conflict Scores by 7.3 points (31.5 vs. 38.8, p < 0.001), lower Decisional Regret Scores by 5.4 points (23.8 vs. 29.2, p < 0.001). Conclusion We found that video education on prenatal genetic testing improved patients' knowledge, decreased testing and decisional conflict and regret regarding testing. This may indicate improved understanding of testing options and more informed decisions that align with their personal values and beliefs. This standardized video can be easily implemented in clinical practice to increase patient understanding and support decisions that align with patient's values. Key Points

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference14 articles.

1. Screening for fetal aneuploidy;American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists;Obstet Gynecol,2016

2. Prenatal screening: current practice, new developments, ethical challenges;A de Jong;Bioethics,2015

3. Beyond the brochure: innovations in clinical counseling practices for prenatal genetic testing options;D Knutzen;J Perinat Neonatal Nurs,2019

4. The power of regret;J Groopman;N Engl J Med,2017

5. Variation in women's understanding of prenatal testing;A S Bryant;Obstet Gynecol,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3