Affiliation:
1. Department of Hospital Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Community Care; Department of Pediatric Hospital Medicine, Pediatrics Institute; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
2. Center for Value-Based Care Research, Cleveland Clinic Community Care, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
3. Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
Abstract
Abstract
Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) causes preventable in-hospital morbidity. Pharmacologic prophylaxis reduces VTE in at-risk patients but also increases bleeding. To increase appropriate prescribing, a risk calculator to guide prophylaxis decisions was developed. Despite efforts to promote its use, providers accessed it infrequently.
Objective This study aimed to understand provider perspectives on VTE prophylaxis and facilitators and barriers to using the risk calculator.
Design This is a qualitative study exploring provider perspectives on VTE prophylaxis and the VTE risk calculator.
Participants We interviewed attending physicians and advanced practice providers who used the calculator, and site champions who promoted calculator use. Providers were categorized by real-world usage over a 3-month period: low (<20% of the time), moderate (20–50%), or high (>50%).
Approach During semistructured interviews, we asked about experiences with VTE, calculator use, perspectives on its implementation, and experiences with other risk assessment tools. Once thematic saturation was reached, transcripts were analyzed using content analysis to identify themes.
Results Fourteen providers participated. Five were high utilizers, three were moderate utilizers, and six were low utilizers. Three site champions participated. Eight major themes were identified as follows: (1) ease of use, (2) perception of VTE risk, (3) harms of thromboprophylaxis, (4) overestimation of calculator use, (5) confidence in own ability, (6) underestimation of risk by calculator, (7) variability of trust in calculator, and (8) validation to withhold prophylaxis from low-risk patients.
Conclusions While providers found the calculator is easy to use, routine use may be hindered by distrust of its recommendations. Inaccurate perception of VTE and bleeding risk may prevent calculator use.
Funder
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Reference20 articles.
1. How complete is the evidence for thromboembolism prophylaxis in general medicine patients? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials;G M Bump;J Hosp Med,2009
2. Costs of venous thromboembolism associated with hospitalization for medical illness;K P Cohoon;Am J Manag Care,2015
3. Prevention of VTE in nonsurgical patients. Antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines;S R Kahn;Chest,2012
4. American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prophylaxis for hospitalized and nonhospitalized medical patients;H J Schünemann;Blood Adv,2018
5. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis among medical patients at US hospitals;M B Rothberg;J Gen Intern Med,2010
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献