Computed Tomography Colonography as a Sensible Option for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Evidence Based on Metanalysis

Author:

Borges Ingrid Chaves de Souza1ORCID,Cunha Natália Costa Resende1ORCID,Rassi Amanda Marsiaj1ORCID,de Oliveira Marcela Garcia1ORCID,Leão-Cordeiro Jacqueline Andréia Bernardes2ORCID,Ataides Fábio Silvestre1ORCID,Almeida Rogério José1ORCID,Vilanova-Costa Cesar Augusto Sam Tiago3ORCID,Silva Antonio Márcio Teodoro Cordeiro14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Medical, Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil

2. Nursing School, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil

3. Laboratory of Tumor Biology and Oncogenetics, Hospital Araújo Jorge, Associação de Combate ao Câncer em Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil

4. Postgraduate Program in Environmental Sciences and Health, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil

Abstract

Abstract Objective This metanalysis aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of computed tomography colonography in colorectal polyp detection. Methods A literature search was performed in the PubMed and Web of Science databases. Results A total of 1,872 patients (males 57.2%, females 42.8%) aged 49 to 82 years old (mean age 59.7 ± 5.3 years) were included in this metanalysis. The estimated sensitivity of computed tomography colonography was 88.4% (46.3–95.7%, coefficient of variation [CV] = 28.5%) and the estimated specificity was 73.6% (47.4–100.0%, CV = 37.5%). For lesions up to 9 mm, the sensitivity was 82.5% (62.0–99.9%, CV = 25.1%) and the specificity was 79.2% (32.0–98.0%, CV = 22.9%). For lesions > 9 mm, the sensitivity was 90.2% (64.0–100.0%, CV = 7.4%) and the specificity was 94.7% (80.0–100.0%, CV = 6.2%). No statistically significant differences in sensitivity according to the size of the lesion were found (p = 0.0958); however, the specificity was higher for lesions > 9 mm (p < 0.0001). Conclusions Most of the studies analyzed in the present work were conducted before 2010, which is about a decade after computed tomography colonography started being indicated as a screening method by European and American guidelines. Therefore, more studies aimed at analyzing the technique after further technological advancements are necessary, which could lead to the development of more modern devices.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Gastroenterology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3