National Outcomes of Elective Hybrid Arch Debranching with Endograft Exclusion versus Total Arch Replacement Procedures: Analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database

Author:

Wallen Tyler1ORCID,Carter Timothy2,Habertheuer Andreas1,Badhwar Vinay3,Jacobs Jeffrey P.1,Yerokun Babatunde4ORCID,Wallace Amelia4,Milewski Karianna1,Szeto Wilson Y.1,Bavaria Joseph E.1,Vallabhajosyula Prashanth5

Affiliation:

1. Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida

2. Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

3. Division of Cardiac Surgery, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia

4. Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

5. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut

Abstract

Abstract Objective Hybrid arch procedures (arch vessel debranching with thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair [TEVAR] coverage of arch pathology) have been presented as an alternative to total arch replacement (TAR). But multicenter-based analyses of these two procedures are needed to benchmark the field and establish areas of improvement. Methods The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Adult Cardiac Surgery Database from July 2014 to December 2015 was queried for elective TAR and hybrid arch procedures. Demographics and operative characteristics were compared and stepwise variable selection was used to create a risk-set used for adjustment of all multivariable models. Results A total of 1,011 patients met inclusion criteria, 884 underwent TAR, and 127 had hybrid arch procedures. TAR patients were younger (mean age: 62.7 ± 13.3 vs. 66.7 ± 11.9 years; p = 0.001) and had less peripheral vascular disease (34.0 vs. 49.6%; p < 0.001) and preoperative dialysis (1.7 vs. 4.7%; p = 0.026), but similar history of stroke (p = 0.91)/cerebrovascular disease (p = 0.52). TAR patients had more concomitant procedures (60 vs. 34.6%; p < 0.0001). TAR patients had lower mortality (6.7 vs. 12.6%; p = 0.02), stroke (6.9 vs. 15%; p = 0.002), paralysis (1.8 vs. 7.1%; p = 0.002), renal failure (4.6 vs. 8.7%; p = 0.045), and STS morbidity (34.2 vs. 42.5%; p = 0.067). Composite mortality, stroke, and paralysis were significantly lower with TAR (11.5 vs. 25.2%; p = 0.0001). After risk adjustment, analysis showed hybrid arch procedures imparted an increased odds of mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 1.91, p = 0.046), stroke (OR = 2.3, p = 0.005), and composite endpoint of stroke or mortality (OR = 2.31, p = 0.0002). Conclusion TAR remains the gold standard for elective aortic arch pathologies. Despite risk adjustment, hybrid arch procedures were associated with increased risk of mortality and stroke, advocating for careful adoption of these strategies.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Surgery

Reference21 articles.

1. Hybrid approaches in the treatment of aortic arch aneurysms: postoperative and midterm outcomes;J Bavaria;J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2013

2. Current results of open total arch replacement versus hybrid thoracic endovascular aortic repair for aortic arch aneurysm: a meta-analysis of comparative studies;U Benedetto;J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2013

3. Early- and medium-term results after aortic arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk techniques-a single center study;S Leontyev;Ann Cardiothorac Surg,2013

4. Total aortic arch replacement with a novel four-branched frozen elephant trunk graft: first-in-man results;M Shrestha;Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,2013

5. Type I and Type II hybrid aortic arch replacement: postoperative and mid-term outcome analysis;P Vallabhajosyula;Ann Cardiothorac Surg,2013

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3