Developing the Minimum Dataset for the New Mexico Decedent Image Database

Author:

Daneshvari Berry Shamsi12,Kroth Philip J.1,Edgar Heather J. H.2,Warner Teddy D.2

Affiliation:

1. Western Michigan University, Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States

2. University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Abstract

Abstract Background A minimum dataset (MDS) can be determined ad hoc by an investigator or small team; by a metadata expert; or by using a consensus method to take advantage of the global knowledge and expertise of a large group of experts. The first method is the most commonly applied. Objective Here, we describe a use of the third approach using a modified Delphi method to determine the optimal MDS for a dataset of full body computed tomography scans. The scans are of decedents whose deaths were investigated at the New Mexico Office of the Medical Investigator and constitute the New Mexico Decedent Image Database (NMDID). Methods The authors initiated the consensus process by suggesting 50 original variables to elicit expert reactions. Experts were recruited from a variety of scientific disciplines and from around the world. Three rounds of variable selection showed high rates of consensus. Results In total, 59 variables were selected, only 52% of which the original resource authors selected. Using a snowball method, a second set of experts was recruited to validate the variables chosen in the design phase. During the validation phase, no variables were selected for deletion. Conclusion NMDID is likely to remain more “future proof” than if a single metadata expert or only the original team of investigators designed the metadata.

Funder

National Institute of Justice

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Health Information Management,Computer Science Applications,Health Informatics

Reference31 articles.

1. The eICU Collaborative Research Database, a freely available multi-center database for critical care research;T J Pollard;Sci Data,2018

2. A research database for improved data management and analysis in longitudinal studies;R A Bielefeld;MD Comput,1995

3. Medical image databases: a content-based retrieval approach;H D Tagare;J Am Med Inform Assoc,1997

4. Metadata generation: processes, people and tools;J Greenberg;Bull Am Soc Inf Sci Technol,2005

5. Quality assurance for digital learning object repositories: issues for the metadata creation process;C Sarah;ALT J,2004

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3