Asthma Medication Regimens in Pregnancy: Longitudinal Changes in Asthma Status

Author:

Rohn Matthew C.H.1ORCID,Stevens Danielle R.1,Kanner Jenna1,Nobles Carrie1,Chen Zhen1,Grantz Katherine L.1ORCID,Sherman Seth2,Grobman William A.3,Kumar Rajesh34,Biggio Joseph56,Mendola Pauline17

Affiliation:

1. Division of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

2. The Emmes Company, Rockville, Maryland

3. Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois

4. Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

5. Ochsner Baptist Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana

6. Center for Women's Reproductive Health, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama

7. Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to assess the impact of common asthma medication regimens on asthma symptoms, exacerbations, lung function, and inflammation during pregnancy. Study Design A total of 311 women with asthma were enrolled in a prospective pregnancy cohort. Asthma medication regimen was categorized into short-acting β agonist (SABA) alone, SABA + inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), SABA + ICS + long-acting β agonist (LABA), and no asthma medications (reference). We evaluated asthma control at enrollment (< 15 weeks' gestation) and its change into trimesters 2 and 3, including per cent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (%FEV1) and peak expiratory flow (%PEF), pulse oximetry, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), asthma symptoms (asthma attacks/month, night symptoms/week), and severe exacerbations. Linear mixed models adjusted for site, age, race, annual income, gestational age, body mass index, and smoking, and propensity scores accounted for asthma control status at baseline. Results Women taking SABA + ICS and SABA + ICS + LABA had better first trimester %PEF (83.5% [75.7–91.3] and 84.6% [76.9–92.3], respectively) compared with women taking no asthma medications (72.7% [66.0–79.3]). Women taking SABA + ICS + LABA also experienced improvements in %FEV1 (+11.1%, p < 0.01) in the third trimester and FeNO in the second (−12.3 parts per billion [ppb], p < 0.01) and third (−11.0 ppb, p < 0.01) trimesters as compared with the trajectory of women taking no medications. SABA + ICS use was associated with increased odds of severe exacerbations in the first (odds ratio [OR]: 2.22 [1.10–4.46]) and second (OR: 3.15 [1.11–8.96]) trimesters, and SABA + ICS + LABA use in the second trimester (OR: 7.89 [2.75–21.47]). Women taking SABA alone were similar to those taking no medication. Conclusion Pregnant women taking SABA + ICS and SABA + ICS + LABA had better lung function in the first trimester. SABA + ICS + LABA was associated with improvements in lung function and inflammation across gestation. However, both the SABA + ICS and SABA + ICS + LABA groups had a higher risk of severe exacerbation during early to mid-pregnancy. Key Points

Funder

Northwestern University

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Emmes Company for the Data Coordinating Center

NIH Medical Research Scholars Program Fund

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynaecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Reference32 articles.

1. Obstetric complications among US women with asthma;P Mendola;Am J Obstet Gynecol,2013

2. Outcomes of pregnancy in asthmatic women;M P Dombrowski;Immunol Allergy Clin North Am,2006

3. Spirometry is related to perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with asthma;M Schatz;Am J Obstet Gynecol,2006

4. National surveillance of asthma: United States, 2001-2010;J E Moorman;Vital Health Stat 3,2012

5. Maternal asthma is an independent risk factor for long-term respiratory morbidity of the offspring;E Spiegel;Am J Perinatol,2018

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3