Placental Transfusion, Timing of Plastic Wrap or Bag Placement, and Preterm Neonates

Author:

Engle William1,Lien Izlin1,Benneyworth Brian23,Tully Jennifer Stanton3,Barbato Alana3,Kunkel Melissa3,Boon Win4,Waheed Saira5,Hoesli Sandra3,Chua Rosario67,Singhal Abhay3,Buchh Basharat89,Winchester Paul3,Guilfoy Veronica3,Proctor Cathy3,Sanchez Mario10,Joyce Jeffrey3,He Tian11

Affiliation:

1. Section of Neonatal-Perinatal Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana

2. Global Medical Affairs, Incretin Portfolio, Eli Lilly Corporation, Indianapolis, Indiana

3. Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana

4. Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan

5. Department of Pediatrics, Ascension St Vincent Hospital, Indianapolis, Indiana

6. Department of Pediatrics, Franciscan Health Lafayette East, Lafayette, Indiana

7. Department of Pediatrics, Porter Regional Hospital, Valparaiso, Indiana

8. Department of Pediatrics, Beacon Health Memorial Hospital, South Bend, Indiana

9. Department of Pediatrics, Section of Neonatal-Perinatal Pediatrics, South Bend, Indiana

10. Department of Pediatrics, Franciscan Saint Anthony Health Crown Point, Crown Point, Indiana

11. Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana

Abstract

Objective Compare delivery room practices and outcomes of infants born at less than 32 weeks' gestation or less than 1,500 g who have plastic wrap/bag placement simultaneously during placental transfusion to those receiving plastic wrap/bag placement sequentially following placental transfusion. Study Design Retrospective analysis of data from a multisite quality improvement initiative to refine stabilization procedures pertaining to placental transfusion and thermoregulation using a plastic wrap/bag. Delivery room practices and outcome data in 590 total cases receiving placental transfusion were controlled for propensity score matching and hospital of birth. Results The simultaneous and sequential groups were similar in demographic and most outcome metrics. The simultaneous group had longer duration of delayed cord clamping compared with the sequential group (42.3 ± 14.8 vs. 34.1 ± 10.3 seconds, p < 0.001), and fewer number of times cord milking was performed (0.41 ± 1.26 vs. 0.86 ± 1.92 seconds, p < 0.001). The time to initiate respiratory support was also significantly shorter in the simultaneous group (97.2 ± 100.6 vs. 125.2 ± 177.6 seconds, p = 0.02). The combined outcome of death or necrotizing enterocolitis in the simultaneous group was more frequent than in the sequential group (15.3 vs. 9.3%, p = 0.038); all other outcomes measured were similar. Conclusion Timing of plastic wrap/bag placement during placental transfusion did affect duration of delayed cord clamping, number of times cord milking was performed, and time to initiate respiratory support in the delivery room but did not alter birth hospital outcomes or respiratory care practices other than the combined outcome of death or necrotizing enterocolitis. Key Points

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynaecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Reference16 articles.

1. Delayed vs early umbilical cord clamping for preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis;M Fogarty;Am J Obstet Gynecol,2018

2. Delayed versus immediate cord clamping in preterm infants;W Tarnow-Mordi;N Engl J Med,2017

3. Randomised trial of cord clamping at very preterm birth: outcomes at 2 years;L Armstrong-Buisseret;Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed,2020

4. Interventions to prevent hypothermia at birth in preterm and/or low birth weight infants;E M McCall;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2018

5. Part 13: neonatal resuscitation: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care (reprint);M H Wyckoff;Pediatrics,2015

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3