Factors Associated with Meeting Obstetric Care Consensus Guidelines for Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex Cesarean Births

Author:

Wang Tiffany12,Brown Inga12,Huang Jim3,Kawakita Tetsuya1ORCID,Moxley Michael2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, District of Columbia

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Virginia Hospital Center, Arlington, Virginia

3. Department of Biostatistics, MedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, Maryland

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to identify factors associated with meeting the Obstetric Care Consensus (OCC) guidelines for nulliparous, term, singleton, and vertex (NTSV) cesarean births. Materials and methods This was a retrospective case control study of women with NTSV cesarean births between January 2014 and December 2017 at single tertiary care center. Demographics and clinical characteristics were compared between women with NTSV cesarean births which did or did not meet OCC guidelines. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to evaluate the effect of each variable on the odds of meeting OCC guidelines. Results There were 1,834 women with NTSV cesarean births of which 744 (40.6%) met OCC guidelines for delivery and 1,090 (59.4%) did not. After controlling for confounding factors, the odds of meeting OCC guidelines were increased for in-house providers managing with residents (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.44–2.87) and without residents (aOR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.30–2.12), compared with non-in-house providers managing without residents. There was no significant difference in the odds of meeting OCC guidelines for in-house providers managing with or without residents (aOR = 1.23, 95% CI: 0.84–1.79). Conclusion After adjusting for confounding factors, in-house provider coverage, regardless of resident involvement, is associated with increased odds of NTSV cesarean births meeting OCC guidelines. Key Points

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference17 articles.

1. Births: final data for 2016;J A Martin;Natl Vital Stat Rep,2018

2. Cesarean versus vaginal delivery: whose risks? Whose benefits?;K D Gregory;Am J Perinatol,2012

3. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries;R M Silver;Obstet Gynecol,2006

4. Trends in low-risk cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990-2013;M J Osterman;Natl Vital Stat Rep,2014

5. Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery;American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine;Obstet Gynecol,2014

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3