Variation between Clinician-Recorded and Downloaded Invasive Blood Pressure in Extremely Preterm Infants

Author:

Pereira Sujith S.12ORCID,Sinha Ajay K.23,Shah Divyen K.34,Kempley Stephen T.2

Affiliation:

1. Neonatal Unit, Homerton University Hospital, Homerton Healthcare National Health Services Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom

2. Centre for Genomics and Child Health, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom

3. Neonatal Unit, Royal London Hospital, Bart's Health National Health Services Trust, London, United Kingdom

4. Centre for Neuroscience and Trauma, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to examine the variation between clinician-recorded and continuously downloaded invasive blood pressure (BP). Study Design Prospective study where invasive BP data were downloaded every 10 seconds for the first week of life. Hourly clinician-recorded BP was recorded. Agreement between the two methods were examined. Results A total of 1,180 BP measurements were examined from 42 preterm infants with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) gestation and birthweight of 25.7 weeks (1.4) and 802 g (177) respectively. The mean (SD) bias was −0.11 mm Hg (3.17), but the 95% limits of agreement (LOA) varied between −6.3 and +6.1 mm Hg. Inotrope usage was significantly higher for BP measurements that fell in the 5% outliers when compared with those that fell within the 95% LOA (62.7 vs. 44.6%, p = 0.006). Conclusion Clinicians showed no systematic bias to over- or underrecord BP, but some of the greatest differences were found in infants receiving inotropes. Key Points

Funder

Barts Charity

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3