Outcomes of Operative and Nonoperative Treatment for Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD): A Prospective, Multicenter Matched and Unmatched Cohort Assessment with Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up

Author:

Smith Justin1,Lafage Virginie2,Shaffrey Christopher1,Schwab Frank2,Hostin Richard3,Boachie-Adjei Oheneba4,Akbarnia Behrooz5,Klineberg Eric6,Gupta Munish6,Deviren Vedat7,Hart Robert8,Burton Douglas9,Bess Shay10,Ames Christopher11

Affiliation:

1. University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

2. Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, United States

3. Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor Scoliosis Center, Plano, United States

4. Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, United States

5. San Diego Center for Spinal Disorders, La Jolla, United States

6. Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, United States

7. Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States

8. Orthopaedic Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, United States

9. Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, United States

10. Orthopaedic Surgery, Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, United States

11. Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States

Abstract

Introduction Adults with spinal deformity typically present with pain and disability. Aim Our objective was to compare outcomes for operative (op) and nonoperative (nonop) treatment for ASD based on a prospective, multicenter patient population. Material and Methods This is a multicenter, prospective analysis of consecutive ASD patients electing for op or nonop care at enrollment. Inclusion criteria: age > 18 year and ASD. Propensity scores were used to match op and nonop patients based on baseline (BL) ODI, SRS22, maximum thoracolumbar/lumbar Cobb angle, pelvic incidence to lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL), and leg pain numeric rating scale (NRS) score. Results A total of 689 patients met with the criteria, including 286 op and 403 nonop, with mean ages of 53 and 55 years, minimum 2-year follow-up rates of 86 and 55%, and mean follow-up of 24.7 and 24.8 months, respectively. At BL, compared with nonop, op patients had significantly worse HRQL based on ODI, SRS22, SF36, and leg and back pain NRS ( p < 0.001) and had worse deformity based on pelvic tilt, PI-LL, and C7SVA ( p ≤ 0.002). Before reaching minimum 2-year follow-up 38 nonop patients converted to op treatment and were analyzed in the op group. At minimum 2-year follow-up all HRQL measures assessed significantly improved for op patients ( p < 0.001), but none of these measures improved significantly for nonop patients ( p ≥ 0.11). Total 97 matched op–nonop pairs were identified based on propensity scores. At last follow-up the 97 matched op patients had significant improvement in all HRQL measures assessed ( p < 0.001), but the 97 matched nonop patients lacked significant improvement in any of the HRQL measures ( p ≥ 0.20). Paired op–nonop analysis demonstrated the op patients to have significantly better HRQL scores at follow-up for all measures assessed ( p < 0.001), except SF36 MCS ( p = 0.058). Overall minor and major complication rates for op patients were 53 and 40%, respectively. Conclusion Op treatment for ASD can provide significant improvement of HRQL measures at minimum 2-year follow-up. In contrast, nonop treatment appears to at best maintain presenting levels of pain and disability.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Clinical Neurology,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Congenital Thoracolumbar Deformity Complication;Spinal Deformity;2017-12-30

2. Spinal deformity in elderly patients: comparison of two distal termination sites of lumbar curve fusion;European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology;2016-09-19

3. Neurological complications in adult spinal deformity surgery;Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine;2016-06-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3