Predicting procedure duration of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection at Western endoscopy centers

Author:

Dang Hao1ORCID,Dekkers Nik1,Steyerberg Ewout W.2,Baldaque-Silva Francisco34ORCID,Omae Masami3,Haasnoot Krijn J.C.5ORCID,van Tilburg Laurelle6ORCID,Nobbenhuis Kate1,van der Kraan Jolein1,Langers Alexandra M.J.1ORCID,van Hooft Jeanin E.1ORCID,de Graaf Wilmar6,Koch Arjun D.6,Didden Paul7,Moons Leon M.G.7,Hardwick James C.H.1,Boonstra Jurjen J.1

Affiliation:

1. Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

2. Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

3. Endoscopy Unit, Center for Upper Digestive Diseases, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

4. Advanced Endoscopy Center Carlos Moreira da Silva, Pedro Hispano Hospital, Matosinhos, Portugal

5. Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

6. Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands

7. Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract Background and study aims Overcoming logistical obstacles for the implementation of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) requires accurate prediction of procedure times. We aimed to evaluate existing and new prediction models for ESD duration. Patients and methods Records of all consecutive patients who underwent single, non-hybrid colorectal ESDs before 2020 at three Dutch centers were reviewed. The performance of an Eastern prediction model [GIE 2021;94(1):133–144] was assessed in the Dutch cohort. A prediction model for procedure duration was built using multivariable linear regression. The model’s performance was validated using internal validation by bootstrap resampling, internal-external cross-validation and external validation in an independent Swedish ESD cohort. Results A total of 435 colorectal ESDs were analyzed (92% en bloc resections, mean duration 139 minutes, mean tumor size 39 mm). The performance of current unstandardized time scheduling practice was suboptimal (explained variance: R2=27%). We successfully validated the Eastern prediction model for colorectal ESD duration <60 minutes (c-statistic 0.70, 95% CI 0.62–0.77), but this model was limited due to dichotomization of the outcome and a relatively low frequency (14%) of ESDs completed <60 minutes in the Dutch centers. The model was more useful with a dichotomization cut-off of 120 minutes (c-statistic: 0.75; 88% and 17% of “easy” and “very difficult” ESDs completed <120 minutes, respectively). To predict ESD duration as continuous outcome, we developed and validated the six-variable cESD-TIME formula (https://cesdtimeformula.shinyapps.io/calculator/; optimism-corrected R2=61%; R2=66% after recalibration of the slope). Conclusions We provided two useful tools for predicting colorectal ESD duration at Western centers. Further improvements and validations are encouraged with potential local adaptation to optimize time planning.

Funder

Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3