Efficacy and safety of over-the-scope clips for gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Chandrasekar Viveksandeep Thoguluva1,Desai Madhav1,Aziz Muhammad2,Patel Harsh K.3,Gorrepati Venkata Subhash4,Jegadeesan Ramprasad1,Rai Tarun3,Sathyamurthy Anjana3,Murino Alberto5,Hassan Cesare6,Repici Alessandro7,Sharma Prateek3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, United States

2. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, United States

3. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, United States

4. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States

5. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Royal Free Hospital and University College London, London, United Kingdom

6. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Rome, Italy

7. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center and Humanitas University, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Rozzano, Italy

Abstract

Background The over-the-scope clip (OTSC) has been increasingly utilized for the management of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Limited efficacy data are currently available from large-scale studies. Methods An electronic database search was conducted for eligible articles using OTSCs for hemostasis in GI bleeding. The primary outcome was the rate of definitive hemostasis after primary hemostasis and without rebleeding at follow-up. Secondary outcomes were: primary technical success, primary clinical success, rebleeding, and failure rates. Pooled rates were expressed as proportions of patients with events over total patients, 95 % confidence limits (CI) with heterogeneity, and P values of < 0.05 for significance. Results A total of 21 studies (n = 851) were analyzed (62.2 % males), with a median patient age of 69.7 years. The definitive hemostasis rate was 87.8 % (95 %CI 83.7 % – 92 %) after a median follow-up of 56 days. The OTSC was successfully deployed in 97.8 % of patients (95 %CI 96.7 % – 98.9 %) and the primary clinical success rate was 96.6 % (95 %CI 95.1 % – 98.2 %). Rebleeding was seen in 10.3 % of patients (95 %CI 6.5 % – 14.1 %). The failure rate of OTSCs was 9 % (95 %CI 5.2 % – 12.8 %) when used as first-line treatment and 26 % (95 %CI 16.1 % – 36.0 %) when used as second-line treatment. Conclusion This systematic review showed high rates of definitive hemostasis, technical success, and clinical success, along with low rebleeding rates when OTSCs were used for the treatment of GI bleeding. The lack of randomized controlled trials of OTSC vs. other therapies makes comparison with conventional treatment difficult.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Gastroenterology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3